Experience and inquiry in the field of industrial poisoning led to a series of demands which, supported as they were by a general movement for the protection of workers, were soon followed by regulations and legislative action. For a long time efforts have been directed to treat industrial disease and poisoning in the same way as has been done in the case of industrial accidents. The question, however, is attended with much greater difficulty. On the other hand, uniform international regulation of questions affecting prevention of disease is called for both on humanitarian and economic grounds. The idea of international legislation for the protection of workers was first mooted about the year 1870. The possibility and need of such intervention was much discussed and interest in it kept constantly alive, especially in Switzerland, until the organisations of the workers took up the idea. Several attempts failed. In France in 1883 a proposal of the Socialist party aiming at international agreement on the subject of protection of the workers was rejected. In 1885 (in opposition to Hertling) Prince Bismarck expressed himself strongly against the possibility of such international protection. But the stone, once set rolling, could not be stayed. In the years 1886, 1887, and 1888 the French and English trade unions, as well as the Swiss Federal Council, took up the question afresh. These endeavours at last took tangible shape in the first International Conference for the protection of workers held in Berlin in March 1890. This date remains a landmark in the history of the subject, but not until ten years later—1900—did the Congress held in Paris for the international legal protection of workers lead to the establishment of what had been repeatedly urged, namely, creation of an International Bureau. This was inaugurated at Basle in 1901 and forms the headquarters of the National Associations for Labour Legislation called into being in various countries.