| | | | +---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----+-------+ | | | | Totals (227) |141|36|24| 9| 8| 3| 3| 2| 1| 0| 0| 0.87| 62.2 | | | | | |===+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+=====+=======+ |830|4082| F1 |Silkie × W. Legh| 2 |3947| F1 |Silkie × W. Legh| 1 | 11| 8|..| 7| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..| 1.22| 40.7 | |830|4079| F1 | Do. | 0 |3947| F1 | Do. | 1 | 18| 7| 6| 3|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 0.82| 53.0 | |830|5379| F1 | Do. | 0 |3947| F1 | Do. | 1 | 18| 4| 5| 3|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 0.77| 60.0 | |830|4081| F1 | Do. | 0 |3947| F1 | Do. | 1 | 24| 6|10| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 0.71| 58.5 | |830|5374| F1 | Do. | 0 |3947| F1 | Do. | 1 | 11| 3| 3| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..|..| 0.67| 61.1 | |830|3946| F1 | Do. | 0 |3947| F1 | Do. | 1 | 19| 1|..|..| 1|..|..|..|..|..|..| 0.24| 90.5 | | | | | |===+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+=====+=======+ | | | | Totals (170) |101|29|24|14| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0.75| 59.4 | +---+----+-----+----------------------------------------------------+---+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-----+-------+ The distribution of table 35 is characterized by its large variability. Although the numbers are small, there are evidences of two modes, one between grades 3 and 6, and the other at from 8 to 10; these evidently correspond to the modes of the typical Silkie and the typical Cochin respectively or to DR and RR types of booting respectively. The distribution of table 35 is additional evidence of the heterozygous nature of the Silkie boot. TABLE 35.--_Distribution of boot-grades in Silkie × Cochin crosses._