Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic FowlDavenport, Charles Benedict
Science
Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic Fowl
Davenport, Charles Benedict
Heredity; Poultry
TABLE 44.--_Brahma crosses. (All entries are percentages.)_
+---------------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | Boot-grade in offspring. |
| Percentage. | From +------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--------+
| |table.| | | | | | | | | | | |Average |
| | | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | grade. |
+---------------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--------+
|Pure blood | 31, B| .... | .... | ....| 3.3| 3.3| 6.6| 24.6| 4.9| 9.8| 14.8| 32.8| 7.62 |
|F1 (D × R) | 32 | 7.9 | 13.8 | 16.8| 31.0| 17.5| 7.8| 3.4| 1.1| 0.7| ....| ....| 2.84 |
|Extracted R × R| 39 | .... | 0.3 | 0.7| 4.2| 7.7| 13.6| 10.5| 9.8| 18.5| 16.0| 18.8| 7.25 |
|DR × RR | 40 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 9.8| 15.1| 16.7| 14.3| 11.9| 7.3| 8.8| 7.2| 4.0| 5.04 |
| | |\---------------\/---------------/ \--------------\/-------------/| |
| | | 50 p. ct. DR. 50 p. ct. RR. | |
|DR × DR | 42 | 12.3 | 7.2 | 12.7| 20.9| 14.9| 12.8| 7.3| 4.4| 3.8| 2.3| 1.4| 3.59 |
| | |\------\/------/ \------\/------/ \--------------\/-------------/| |
| | | 25 p. ct. DD. 50 p. ct. DR. 25 p. ct. RR. | |
|DR × DD | 41 | 29.5 | 21.3 | 16.4| 23.0| 8.2| 1.6| ....| ....| ....| ....| ....| 1.69 |
| | |\-----\/----/|\----------\/---------/| | | | | | |
| | |50 p. ct. DD.| 50 p. ct. DR. | | | | | | |
+---------------+------+-------------+-----------------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--------+
If a heterozygous bird be mated to a recessive the variability
of the offspring is much increased, owing to the occurrence in
the progeny of both DR and RR individuals (table 40). The
offspring do not, to be sure, fall into two distinct and well-defined
types, as in typical Mendelian cases; but one part of the range of
variation agrees fairly with that of pure RR's, _i. e._, Brahmas,
and the remainder with that of heterozygotes. And if we make the
division in the middle of the middle class, viz, 5, we shall find
a close approximation to that equality of extracted recessives and
heterozygotes that the segregation theory calls for (table 44).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account