Animals with scales on their feet, which are held to constitute the
earliest stage of the Primate modification of papillary ridges are such
as the _potoroo_, _wallaby_, _kangaroo_ and _giant ant-eater_. Such
scales register a long, long series of stimuli of friction and pressure
in these and their ancestors, in a level of life before any delicate
discrimination of surfaces came into operation.
The nodular form of skin is present in the Canadian _tree porcupine_,
where rough nodules cluster closely on the surface of both feet, and
it is a significant fact that it shares with the American _opossum_
the peculiarity of nodules on the ventral surface of the powerful
prehensile tail. This adaptation tends to efficiency in its arboreal
life, and may well have been produced by infinitely small degrees of
response in structure in the course of a long evolution.
The _rabbit_ alone have I found with rod-like projections of the
epidermic cells, among which are set in dense order the soft, long,
delicate hairs and which thus conduce to its wonderful power of
treading on sharp objects without injury. We thus see the inner meaning
of dear old Brer Rabbit’s jeer of triumph to Brer Fox, “Born and bred
in a brier bush.” This adaptation might be an unit-character segregated
from the ancestral stock of the Leporidæ, or it might not, but at any
rate the rabbit leads a life in which its walking or running is no
more prominent or frequent than is a good “run” on the part of a hunter
which pursues the hare with his beagles, and one may say at least
this--that its mode of life has _not_ produced a hard rough nodular
surface on its feet by stimuli of pressure and friction and response.
One may observe that there’s a divinity doth shape our ends, rough
hew them as we may, even if some objection be taken to the present
view of rough-hewing of parts of our organism on the ground of its
piecemeal character, rather than dealing with the organism as a whole.
To which it may be replied that the Mendelians give high support to the
piecemeal study of the profound subject of genetics, and further that
the business here is to look separately and simply at a few selected
attributes of parts of an organism, and see how they _began_ to grow
big enough to avoid passing through the meshes of the sieve.
The foregoing examples of animals in which papillary ridges are absent
have been given not in their zoological order, nor as representative
of a great many groups, but as taken from the eighty-six species I
examined myself. The following belong to the same series, but all
present papillary ridges in an ascending scale towards perfection in
man.
Examples of Ridge-covered Palms and Soles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account