One more important quotation from this lecture will suffice. “No
one who has watched the behaviour of scleroblasts and marked the
design in their workmanship can doubt that they have acquired certain
characteristic qualities, chief of which is a sensitiveness to
vibrations--to stresses. We see them build the same form of spicules as
their ancestors, and therefore must suppose that their building quality
is a gift of inheritance. We see them alter their mode of building as
stresses change; we must therefore suppose that their inherited powers
can be changed by the circumstances under which they work.”[69]
[69] Hunterian Lecture on “The Introduction of the Modem Practice of
Bone-grafting.” Royal College of Surgeons of England, January, 1918.
Reported in the _Lancet_, February 9th and 16th, 1918.
In regard to the action of the scleroblasts of sponges I have only
to point out that the cautious words of Professor Keith on the
treacherous ground of inheritance amount to the very same conception
of personal selection and inheritance as are involved in the term
“educability” of Sir E. Ray Lankester. Whether or not in the case of
sponges this be a complete account of the matter it at any rate is a
very important piece of evidence, if valid, for selection. Whether or
not further it is a piece of evidence for a Mendelian factor implicit
in the primordial sponges and released by some loss of inhibiting
factors, as Professor Bateson would probably claim, is another and
far more imaginative conception. The mere neo-Lamarckian with the aid
of personal selection fails to see any difficulty in realising the
wonderful process described by Professor Keith.
An apology must be offered here to the patient reader for the
introduction under the heading of the “Evolution of a Bursa” of the
apparently alien subjects of bone-grafts, artificial new joints and
sponge-spicules, but I have hazarded the guess that all joints in all
animals have been fashioned--“forged by the incident of use,” to employ
a fine phrase of Professor Macdonald’s in another connection--in slow
but intelligible ways by use, and that in them, as elsewhere, function
has preceded structure. This arose so simply out of the story of the
bursæ that I ventured to digress as aforesaid rather than make it the
subject of a separate section.
The Significance of the Proceeding.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account