In the skeletal muscles of the primates many muscles offer themselves
for consideration as examples of inherited structures arising under
the stimuli of altered function, and only a few of these will be dealt
with. It might appear sufficient to those who yield, perhaps too
willingly, to authority, if I were here to try and prove my point by
quoting the statements of one of the greatest anatomists of our time
and country, and so pass on--but it is to be feared authority cannot
carry one far in a dispute so important. Macalister says, however, “The
anatomical arrangement of the muscular system is the physical exponent
of habitual actions and those actions are the chief factors in moulding
the bones and in regulating the position of the somato-pleural vessels
and nerves”--and “the locomotory function and consequent utility of the
trunk-muscles were lost when the early vertebrates became terrestrial.
In higher vertebrates, and notably in man, the mobility of several
regions of the vertebral column differs both in degree and kind: the
outgrowing vertebrate processes show consequent variations, and _the
muscular system is varied accordingly_.”[77] Also “as both origins
and insertions (of muscles) are the creatures of habit, they are both
equally variable with variation of function; but, as in higher animals
the kind of work to be done is more constant than its degree, so,
as a rule, insertions alter less than origins.”[78] Macalister, at
any rate, held a very clear dynamical rather than static view of the
making of the muscular system. But as the days of authority are in a
certain sense gone for ever, and we live under the reign of experiment,
research and questioning, every biologist, within certain limits, does
what is right in his own eyes; there is no King in these days.
[77] _Op. cit._, p. 71. (Italics not in original.)
[78] _Op. cit._, p. 73.
Skeletal muscles are structures in which, if ever, the factors of use
and habit and disuse would be shown, because muscle is a tissue, with
highly active metabolism, so that it has been called “an expensive
tissue” for the animal to maintain.
Muscles of Primates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account