The grouping of animals by structural characters, and by affinities
which are assumed, though based on almost undeniable evidence, whether
into species, families, classes, phyla or sub-phyla, has its apotheosis
in Mollusca and Insects. As to the second of these immense groups
it has always seemed strange that their colourings and structural
characters should have received such intensive study from Weismann to
the exclusion of Mollusca, when he set out to prove his stupendous
negative, and still more that of Vertebrates, among which his chief
difficulty and desired triumph would seem to have lain. Mollusca though
invertebrate are held by many to be in the line of ancestry of the
highest forms of life, and at any rate insects are not. They are most
fruitful fields indeed in which Nature has been able to show what she
could do by her stern selective powers, but, from the point of view of
descent with modification, may be fairly compared to a review of an
army in time of peace, or the Kriegspiel of a German military staff. He
who concerns himself with the fundamental difficulties of the problems
at issue in evolution must make his notes of what experts tell him of
such groups as those of Insects, Mollusca and Birds, and pass on to the
higher forms in which on the one hand function becomes the predominant
partner, and on the other individual experience becomes more and more
important. He feels indeed at liberty to wish the entomologist and
ornithologist all success, and to leave him at peace, in his siding, to
pursue his delightful and interminable studies far from the dust and
din of controversy.
Insectivores.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account