Owing to the nature of the secretion or to the shape of the glands, the
drops are removed from them with singular facility. It is even somewhat
difficult, by the aid of a finely pointed polished needle, slightly
damped with water, to place a minute particle of any kind on one of the
drops; for on withdrawing the [page 335] needle, the drop is generally
withdrawn; whereas with Drosera there is no such difficulty, though the
drops are occasionally withdrawn. From this peculiarity, when a small
insect alights on a leaf of Drosophyllum, the drops adhere to its
wings, feet, or body, and are drawn from the gland; the insect then
crawls onward and other drops adhere to it; so that at last, bathed by
the viscid secretion, it sinks down and dies, resting on the small
sessile glands with which the surface of the leaf is thickly covered.
In the case of Drosera, an insect sticking to one or more of the
exterior glands is carried by their movement to the centre of the leaf;
with Drosophyllum, this is effected by the crawling of the insect, as
from its wings being clogged by the secretion it cannot fly away.
There is another difference in function between the glands of these two
plants: we know that the glands of Drosera secrete more copiously when
properly excited. But when minute particles of carbonate of ammonia,
drops of a solution of this salt or of the nitrate of ammonia, saliva,
small insects, bits of raw or roast meat, albumen, fibrin or cartilage,
as well as inorganic particles, were placed on the glands of
Drosophyllum, the amount of secretion never appeared to be in the least
increased. As insects do not commonly adhere to the taller glands, but
withdraw the secretion, we can see that there would be little use in
their having acquired the habit of secreting copiously when stimulated;
whereas with Drosera this is of use, and the habit has been acquired.
Nevertheless, the glands of Drosophyllum, without being stimulated,
continually secrete, so as to replace the loss by evaporation. Thus
when a plant was placed under a small bell-glass with its inner surface
and support thoroughly wetted, there was no loss by evaporation, and so
much [page 336] secretion was accumulated in the course of a day that
it ran down the tentacles and covered large spaces of the leaves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account