* My son Francis counted the hairs on a space measured by means of a
micrometer, and found that there were 35,336 on a square inch of the
upper surface of a leaf, and 30,035 on the lower surface; that is, in
about the proportion of 100 on the upper to 85 on the lower surface. On
a square inch of both surfaces there were 65,371 hairs. A moderately
fine plant bearing twelve leaves (the larger ones being a little more
than 2 inches in diameter) was now selected, and the area of all the
leaves, together with their foot-stalks (the flower-stems not being
included), was found by a planimeter to be 39.285 square inches; so
that the area of both surfaces was 78.57 square inches. Thus the plant
(excluding the flower-stems) must have borne the astonishing number of
2,568,099 glandular hairs. The hairs were counted late in the autumn,
and by the following spring (May) the leaves of some other plants of
the same lot were found to be from one-third to one-fourth broader and
longer than they were before; so that no doubt the glandular hairs had
increased in number, and probably now much exceeded three millions.
[page 356]
movement makes up for the loss of viscid secretion. In every case it is
some part of the leaf which moves. In Aldrovanda it appears to be the
basal parts alone which contract and carry with them the broad, thin
margins of the lobes. In Dionaea the whole lobe, with the exception of
the marginal prolongations or spikes, curves inwards, though the chief
seat of movement is near the midrib. In Drosera the chief seat is in
the lower part of the tentacles, which, homologically, may be
considered as prolongations of the leaf; but the whole blade often
curls inwards, converting the leaf into a temporary stomach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account