Through the study of fossils, as is well known, geologists have been
led to the all-important generalization that the vast series of
fossiliferous or sedimentary rocks may be separated into a number of
definite groups or formations, each of which being characterized by
its own organic remains, but not properly and strictly, it must be
understood, by the occurrence therein of any one particular fossil.
However, a formation may contain some particular fossil or fossils
not occurring outside of that formation, thus enabling an observer
to identify a given group with tolerable certainty; or, as very
often happens, some particular stratum or subgroup of a series, may
contain peculiar fossils, whereby its existence may be determined with
considerable readiness in divers localities. Each great formation, let
it be said, is properly characterized by the association of certain
fossils, the predominance of certain families or orders, or by an
assemblage of fossil remains that represent the life of the period
during which the formation was deposited.
Fossils, then, not only enable us to determine the age of the deposits
in which they are found, but they also further enable us to arrive at
some very important conclusions respecting the manner in which the
fossiliferous bed was deposited, and, consequently, to the condition
of the particular region occupied by the bed at the period of its
formation. Beds that contain the remains of animals, such as now
inhabit rivers, we know to be fluviatile in their origin, and that
at one time they must have either constituted actual river-beds, or
been deposited by the overflowing of ancient streams. But if the beds
contain the remains of mollusks, minute crustaceans or fish, such as
are found to-day in lakes, then we conclude that they are lacustrine,
and were deposited beneath the waters of former lakes. And, lastly,
if the remains of animals such as now people the oceans are to be
met with in the beds, then we know that they are marine in origin,
and that they are fragments of an old sea-bottom. On the whole, the
conditions under which a bed was deposited, whether in a shallow sea,
in the immediate vicinity of a coast-line, or in deep water, can
often be determined with considerable accuracy from the nature of the
relics of the organisms which they contain. But we have thus far been
dealing with the remains of aquatic animals. When, however, we consider
the remains of aerial and terrestrial animals, or of plants, the
determination of the conditions of deposition is not made out with such
an absolute certainty. Remains of land-animals would, of course, occur
in sub-aerial deposits, that is, in beds, like blown sand, accumulated
upon the land, but the most of such remains of such animals are found
in deposits which have been laid down in water, and hence their present
position is due to the fact that their former owners were either
drowned in rivers or lakes, or borne out to sea by water-channels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account