International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second EditionOppenheim, L. (Lassa)
History
International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second Edition
Oppenheim, L. (Lassa)
International law
treated as spies; since spying can be carried out under false pretences
quite as well as clandestinely. But special care must be taken really to
prove the fact of espionage in such cases, for an individual carrying
despatches is _prima facie_ not a spy and must not be treated as a spy
until proved to be such.
[Footnote 308: Assisting or favouring espionage or knowingly concealing
a spy are, according to a customary rule of International Law,
punishable as though they were themselves acts of espionage; see _Land
Warfare_, § 172.]
[Footnote 309: See below, § 356 (4), concerning wireless telegraphy.]
A remarkable case of espionage is that of Major André,[310] which
occurred in 1780 during the American War of Independence. The American
General Arnold, who was commandant of West Point, on the North River,
intended to desert the Americans and join the British forces. He opened
negotiations with Sir Henry Clinton for the purpose of surrendering West
Point, and Major André was commissioned by Sir Henry Clinton to make the
final arrangements with Arnold. On the night of September 21, Arnold and
André met outside the American and British lines, but André, after
having changed his uniform for plain clothes, undertook to pass the
American lines on his return, furnished with a passport under the name
of John Anderson by General Arnold. He was caught, convicted as a spy,
and hanged. As he was not seeking information,[311] and therefore was
not a spy according to article 29 of the Hague Regulations, a conviction
for espionage would not, if such a case occurred to-day, be justified.
But it would be possible to convict for war treason, for André was no
doubt negotiating treason. Be that as it may, George III. considered
André a martyr, and honoured his memory by granting a pension to his
mother and a baronetcy to his brother.[312]
[Footnote 310: See Halleck in _A.J._ V. (1911), p. 594.]
[Footnote 311: Halleck, _loc. cit._, p. 598, asserts the contrary.]
[Footnote 312: See Phillimore, III. § 106; Halleck, I. p. 575; Rivier,
II. p. 284.]
[Sidenote: Punishment of Espionage.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account