International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second EditionOppenheim, L. (Lassa)
History
International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second Edition
Oppenheim, L. (Lassa)
International law
(5) The giving over to pillage of a town or place, even when taken by
assault, is forbidden (article 7).
VIII
INTERFERENCE WITH SUBMARINE TELEGRAPH CABLES
Moore, VII. § 1176--Westlake, II. pp. 280-283--Liszt, § 41,
III.--Bonfils, No. 1278--Pradier-Fodéré, VI. No. 2772--Fiore, III.
No. 1387, and Code, Nos. 1650-1655--Perels, § 35, p. 185--Perdrix,
_Les câbles sousmarines et leur protection internationale_
(1902)--Kraemer, _Die unterseeischen Telegraphenkabel in
Kriegszeiten_ (1903)--Scholz, _Krieg und Seekabel_
(1904)--Zuculin, _I cavi sottomarini e il telegrafo senza fili nel
diritto di guerra_ (1907)--Holland, in _Journal de Droit
International Privé et de la Jurisprudence comparée_ (Clunet),
XXV. (1898), pp. 648-652, and _War_, No. 114--Goffin, in _The Law
Quarterly Review_, XV. (1899), pp. 145-154--Bar, in the _Archiv
für Oeffentliches Recht_, XV. (1900), pp. 414-421--Rey, in _R.G._
VIII. (1901), pp. 681-762--Dupuis, in _R.G._ X. (1903), pp.
532-547--Nordon in _The Law Magazine and Review_, XXXII. (1907),
pp. 166-188. See also the literature quoted above, vol. I., at the
commencement of § 286.
[Sidenote: Uncertainty of Rules concerning Interference with Submarine
Telegraph Cables.]
§ 214. As the "International Convention[426] for the Protection of
Submarine Telegraph Cables" of 1884 expressly stipulates by article 15
that freedom of action is reserved to belligerents, the question is not
settled how far belligerents are entitled to interfere with submarine
telegraph cables. The only conventional rule concerning this question is
article 54 of the Hague Regulations, inserted by the Second Peace
Conference, which enacts that submarine cables connecting occupied enemy
territory with a neutral territory shall not be seized or destroyed, and
that, if a case of absolute necessity has compelled the occupant to
seize or destroy such cable, it must be restored after the conclusion of
peace and indemnities paid. There is no rule in existence which deals
with other possible cases of seizure and destruction.
[Footnote 426: See above, vol. I. §§ 286 and 287.]
The Institute of International Law has studied the matter and
adopted,[427] at its meeting at Brussels in 1902, the following five
rules:--
(1) Le câble sousmarin reliant deux territoires neutres est
inviolable.
(2) Le câble reliant les territoires de deux belligérants ou deux
parties du territoire d'un des belligérants peut être coupé
partout, excepté dans la mer territoriale et dans les eaux
neutralisées dépendant d'un territoire neutre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account