Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
But
\aleph_{0}.
">
In fact, as we shall see later, is a very important number,
namely, the number of terms in a series which has "continuity"
in the sense in which this word is used by Cantor. Assuming
space and time to be continuous in this sense (as we commonly
do in analytical geometry and kinematics), this will be the
number of points in space or of instants in time; it will also be
the number of points in any finite portion of space, whether
[Pg 86]
line, area, or volume. After , is the most important and
interesting of infinite cardinal numbers.
Although addition and multiplication are always possible
with infinite cardinals, subtraction and division no longer give
definite results, and cannot therefore be employed as they are
employed in elementary arithmetic. Take subtraction to begin
with: so long as the number subtracted is finite, all goes well;
if the other number is reflexive, it remains unchanged. Thus
, if is finite; so far, subtraction gives a perfectly
definite result. But it is otherwise when we subtract from
itself; we may then get any result, from 0 up to . This is
easily seen by examples. From the inductive, numbers, take
away the following collections of terms:—
(1) All the inductive numbers—remainder, zero.
(2) All the inductive numbers from onwards—remainder,
the numbers from 0 to , numbering terms in all.
(3) All the odd numbers—remainder, all the even numbers,
numbering terms.
All these are different ways of subtracting from , and
all give different results.
As regards division, very similar results follow from the fact
that is unchanged when multiplied by 2 or 3 or any finite
number or by . It follows that divided
by may have
any value from 1 up to .
From the ambiguity of subtraction and division it results
that negative numbers and ratios cannot be extended to infinite
numbers. Addition, multiplication, and exponentiation proceed
quite satisfactorily, but the inverse operations—subtraction,
division, and extraction of roots—are ambiguous, and the notions
that depend upon them fail when infinite numbers are concerned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account