Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
The ultimate oscillation may contain no terms, or one term,
or many terms. In the first two cases the function has a definite
limit for approaches from below. If the ultimate oscillation
has one term, this is fairly obvious. It is equally true if it has
none; for it is not difficult to prove that, if the ultimate oscillation
is null, the boundary of the ultimate section is the same as
that of the ultimate upper section, and may be defined as the
limit of the function for approaches from below. But if the
ultimate oscillation has many terms, there is no definite limit to
the function for approaches from below. In this case we can
take the lower and upper boundaries of the ultimate oscillation
(i.e. the lower boundary of the ultimate upper section and the
upper boundary of the ultimate section) as the lower and upper
limits of its "ultimate" values for approaches from below.
Similarly we obtain lower and upper limits of the "ultimate"
values for approaches from above. Thus we have, in the general
case, four limits to a function for approaches to a given argument.
The limit for a given argument only exists when all these four
are equal, and is then their common value. If it is also the
value for the argument , the function is continuous for this
argument. This may be taken as defining continuity: it is
equivalent to our former definition.
We can define the limit of a function for a given argument
(if it exists) without passing through the ultimate oscillation
and the four limits of the general case. The definition proceeds,
in that case, just as the earlier definition of continuity proceeded.
Let us define the limit for approaches from below. If there is to
be a definite limit for approaches to from below, it is necessary
and sufficient that, given any small number , two values for
arguments sufficiently near to (but both less than ) will differ
[Pg 112]
by less than ; i.e. if is sufficiently small, and our arguments
both lie between and ( excluded), then the difference
between the values for these arguments will be less than .
This is to hold for any , however small; in that case the
function has a limit for approaches from below. Similarly
we define the case when there is a limit for approaches from
above. These two limits, even when both exist, need not be
identical; and if they are identical, they still need not be identical
with the value for the argument . It is only in this last case
that we call the function continuous for the argument .
A function is called "continuous" (without qualification)
when it is continuous for every argument.
Another slightly different method of reaching the definition
of continuity is the following:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account