Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1Hallam, Henry
History
Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1
Hallam, Henry
Literature, Modern -- History and criticism
It should here be observed, that the language underwent its
metamorphosis into English by much less rapid gradations in some
parts of the kingdom than in others. Not only the popular dialect
of many counties, especially in the north, retained long, and still
retains, a larger proportion of the Anglo-Saxon peculiarities, but
we have evidence that they were not everywhere disused in writing.
A manuscript in the Kentish dialect, if that phrase is correct,
bearing the date of 1340, is more Anglo-Saxon than any of the poems
ascribed to the thirteenth century, which we read in Warton, such
as the legends of saints or the Ormulum. This very curious fact was
first made known to the public by Mr. Thorpe, in his translation of
Cædmon, preface, p. xii.; and an account of the manuscript itself,
rather fuller than that of Mr. T., has since been given in the
catalogue of the Arundel MSS. in the British Museum.
[87] Henry’s Hist. of Britain, vol. viii., appendix. “Between 1244 and
1258,” says Sir F. Madden, “we know, was written the versification
of part of a meditation of St. Augustine, as proved by the age of
the prior, who gave the manuscript to the Durham library,” p. 49.
This, therefore, will be strictly the oldest piece of English, to
the date of which we can approach by more than conjecture.
[88] Madden’s Havelock, p. 52.
|English of the fourteenth century. Chaucer. Gower.|
51. The fourteenth century was not unproductive of men, both English and
Scots, gifted with the powers of poetry. Laurence Minot, an author
unknown to Warton, but whose poems on the wars of Edward III. are
referred by their publisher Ritson to 1352, is perhaps the first
original poet in our language that has survived; since such of his
predecessors as are now known appear to have been merely translators, or
at best amplifiers of a French or Latin original. The earliest
historical or epic narrative is due to John Barbour, archdeacon of
Aberdeen, whose long poem in the Scots dialect, The Bruce, commemorating
the deliverance of his country, seems to have been completed in 1373.
But our greatest poet of the middle ages, beyond comparison, was
Geoffrey Chaucer; and I do not know that any other country, except
Italy, produced one of equal variety in invention, acuteness in
observation, or felicity of expression. A vast interval must be made
between Chaucer and any other English poet; yet Gower, his contemporary,
though not, like him, a poet of nature’s growth, had some effect in
rendering the language less rude, and exciting a taste for verse; if he
never rises, he never sinks low; he is always sensible, polished,
perspicuous, and not prosaic in the worst sense of the word. Longlands,
the supposed author of Piers Plowman’s Vision, with far more imaginative
vigour, has a more obsolete and unrefined diction.
|General disuse of French in England.|
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account