Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1Hallam, Henry
History
Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1
Hallam, Henry
Literature, Modern -- History and criticism
It is evident that the use of the numeral signs does not of itself
imply an acquaintance with the Arabic calculation, though it was a
necessary step to it. Signs bearing some resemblance to these (too
great for accident) are found in MSS. of Boethius, and are
published by Montucla, (vol. i. planch. ii.) In one MS. they appear
with names written over each of them, not Greek, or Latin, or
Arabic, or in any known language. These singular names, and nearly
the same forms, are found also in a manuscript well deserving of
notice,--No. 343 of the Arundel MSS., in the British Museum, and
which is said to have belonged to a convent at Mentz. This has been
referred by some competent judges to the twelfth, and by others to
the very beginning of the thirteenth century. It purports to be an
introduction to the art of multiplying and dividing numbers;
quicquid ab abacistis excerpere potui, compendiose collegi. The
author uses nine digits, but none for ten, or zero, as is also the
case in the MS. of Boethius. Sunt vero integri novem sufficientes
ad infinitam multiplicationem, quorum nomina singulis sunt
superjecta. A gentleman of the British Museum, who had the
kindness, at my request, to give his attention to this hitherto
unknown evidence in the controversy, is of opinion that the
rudiments, at the very least, of our numeration are indicated in
it, and that the author comes within one step of our present
system, which is no other than supplying an additional character
for zero. His ignorance of this character renders his process
circuitous, as it does not contain the principle of juxtaposition
for the purpose of summing; but it does contain the still more
essential principle, a decuple increase of value for the same sign,
in a progressive series of location from right to left. I shall be
gratified if this slight notice should cause the treatise, which is
very short, to be published, or more fully explained.
[264] Montucla, whom several other writers have followed, erroneously
places this work in the beginning of the fifteenth century.
|Proofs of them in thirteenth century.|
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account