Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 2Hallam, Henry
History
Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 2
Hallam, Henry
Literature, Modern -- History and criticism
[70] Casaubon himself hailed Grotius as in the right path. In
hodiernis contentionibus in negotio religionis et doctè et piè
judicat, et in veneratione antiquitatis cum iis sentit, qui
optimè sentiunt. Epist. 883. See also 772, which is addressed to
him. This high respect for the fathers and for the authority of
the primitive church grew strongly upon him, and the more because
he found they were hostile to the Calvinistic scheme. He was
quite delighted at finding Jerome and Chrysostom on his side.
Epist. 29. (1614). In the next year, writing to Vossius, he goes
a great length. Cæterum ego reformatarum ecclesiarum miseriam in
hoc maximè deploro, quod cum symbola condere catholicæ sit
ecclesiæ, ipsis inter se nunquam eam in rem convenire sit datum,
atque interim libelli apologetici ex re nata scripti ad
imperatorem, reges, principes, aut ut in concilio œcumenico
exhiberentur, trahi cœperint in usum longè alienum. Quid enim
magis est alienum ab unitate catholica quam quod diversis in
regionibus pastores diversa populo tradere coguntur? Quam mirata
fuisset hoc prodigium pia antiquitas! Sed hæc aliaque multa
mussitanda sunt nobis ob iniquitatem temporum. Epist. 66. He was
at this time, as he continued till near the end of his life, when
he moved on farther, highly partial to the Anglican church. He
was, however, too Erastian for the English bishops of the reign
of James, as appears by a letter addressed to him by Overall, who
objected to his giving, in his treatise De Imperio circa Sacra, a
definitive power in controversies of faith to the civil
magistrate, and to his putting episcopacy among non-essentials,
which the bishops held to be of divine right. Grotius adhered to
his opinion, that episcopacy was not commanded as a perpetual
institution, and thought, at that time, that there was no other
distinction between bishops and priests than of precedency.
Nusquam meminit, he says in one place, Clemens Romanus exsortis
illius episcoporum auctoritatis, quæ ecclesiæ consuetudine post
Marci mortem Alexandriæ, atque eo exemplo alibi, introduci cœpit,
sed planè ut Paulus Apostolus, ostendit ecclesias communi
presbyterorum, qui iidem omnes et episcopi ipsi Pauloque
dicuntur, consilio fuisse gubernatas. Even in his latter writings
he seems never to have embraced the notions of some Anglican
divines on this subject, but contents himself, in his remarks on
Cassander, who had said, singularly as it may be thought,
Convenit _inter omnes_ olim Apostolorum ætate inter episcopos et
presbyteros discrimen nullum fuisse, sed postmodum ordinis
servandi et schismatis evitandi causa episcopum presbyteris
fuisse præpositum, with observing, Episcopi sunt presbyterorum
principes; et ista προστασια [prostasia] (præsidentia) à Christo
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account