Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 2Hallam, Henry
History
Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 2
Hallam, Henry
Literature, Modern -- History and criticism
[73] Si tamen non tam quid loquantur quam quid sentiant
attendimus, certum est eos veri corporis et sanguinis secundum
substantiam acceptorum præsentiam non admittere. Rectius autem
fuerit utramque partem simpliciter et ingenuè, quod sentit,
profiteri, quam alteram alteri ambiguis loquendi formulis
imponere. Qualem conciliandi rationem inierunt olim Philippus et
Bucerus, nempe ut præscriberentur formulæ, quarum verba utraque
pars amplecteretur, sed singulæ suo sensu acciperent ac
interpretarentur. Quem conatum, quamvis ex pio eoque ingente
concordiæ desiderio et studio profectum, nulla successûs
felicitas excepit. p. 70. This observation is very just in the
abstract; but in the early period of the reformation, there were
strong reasons for evading points of difference, in the hope that
the truth would silently prevail in the course of time. We,
however, who come later, are to follow the advice of Calixtus,
and, in judging as well as we can, of the opinions of men, must
not altogether regard their words. Upon no theological
controversy, probably, has there been so much of studied
ambiguity as on that of the eucharist. Calixtus passes a similar
censure on the equivocations of some great men of the preceding
century in his other treatise mentioned in the text.
[74] Consensu itaque primæ ecclesiæ ex symbolis et scriptis
manifesto doctrina Christiana rectè confirmatur. Intelligimus
autem doctrinam fundamentalem et necessariam, non quasvis
appendices et quæstiones, aut etiam quorundam scripturæ locorum
interpretationes. De talibus enim unanimis et universalis
consensus non poterit erui vel proferri. Et magis apud plerosque
spectandum est, quid tanquam communem ecclesiæ sententiam
proponunt, quam quomodo eam confirmant aut demonstrant, p. 85. I
have not observed in the little I know of Calixtus, any proof of
his inclination toward the church of Rome.
Gerard Vossius, as Episcopius wrote to Vorstius in 1615, declared
in his inaugural lecture as professor of theology, his
determination to follow the consent of antiquity, in explicatione
Scripturarum et controversiarum diremtionibus diligenter
examinare et expendere catholicum et antiquissimum consensum, cum
sine dubio illud quod a pluribus et antiquissimis dictum est,
verissimum sit. Epist. Virorum præstantium, p. 6.
|High-church party in England.|
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account