Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
In Clement of Rome (c. 13), in Clement of Alexandria (_Stromata_,
ii. p. 476), and partly also in the _Epistle of Polycarp_ (c. 2), we
find the following quotation:—“Be ye merciful that ye may obtain
mercy: forgive that ye may be forgiven: as ye do, so shall it be
done to you: as ye give, so shall it be given to you: as ye judge,
so shall ye be judged: as ye are kind, so shall kindness be shown to
you: with what measure ye mete, it shall be meted unto you.” We find
also in Clement of Rome (c. 46), and in Clement of Alexandria
(_Stromata_, iii. p. 561), the quotation: “Woe to that man: it were
good for him if he had never been born, rather than that he should
offend one of my elect: it were better for him that a millstone were
hanged about his neck and he be drowned in the depth of the sea,
than that he should offend one of my little ones.” Neither of these
quotations is found literally in our canonical Gospels. Accordingly,
Rendel Harris concludes from the testimony of these various
witnesses that they must have been taken from an Urevangelium, now
perished (_Contemporary Review_, Sept. 1897). This view is combated,
it seems to me rightly, by H. T. Andrews in the _Expository Times_
for November 1897, p. 94 f. He thinks it probable that Clement of
Alexandria and Polycarp are both dependent on Clement of Rome.[125]
(5) In spite of all these difficulties, a systematic examination of
the Patristic quotations remains one of the most important tasks for
the textual criticism of the N. T. We have most useful collections,
both ancient and modern, of passages from the Fathers to illustrate
the history of the Canon, and their use of the Scriptures has been
scrutinised in the interests of dogmatic history, but there are not
yet, so far as I know, any collections of Patristic quotations to
elucidate the history of the text. Two things are specially wanted
at present. One is a collection, arranged according to time and
locality, of all the passages in which the Fathers appeal to
ἀντίγραφα. In the new volumes of Origen, _e.g._, we find two such
references—κατά τινα τῶν ἀντιγράφων τοῦ κατὰ Μάρκον εὐαγγελίου (i.
113), and κατὰ τὰ κοινὰ τῶν ἀντιγράφων (ii. 52).[126] The other
desideratum is a collection of all the passages in the biographies
of the Saints where mention is made of the writing of Biblical
manuscripts. It is said of Evagrius, _e.g._, in the _Historia
Lausiaca_ (c. 28 in Preuschen, _Palladius_, p. 111), εὐφυῶς γὰρ
ἔγραφε τὸν ὀξύρυγχον χαρακτῆρα, and the preparation of Biblical
manuscripts is also referred to in the _Vita Epiphanii_ (ed. Petav.
ii.), and in Cassiodorus, _De Institutione Divinarum Literarum_ (see
above, p. 50). On the use hitherto made of Patristic testimony see
the section _De Scriptoribus Ecclesiasticis_ in _TiGr._, 1129-1230.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account