Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament

Name: Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Author: Nestle, Eberhard

Nestle, Eberhard

Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual

Socin, _Arabic Grammar_, 2nd ed., p. 55, line 14; p. 56, line 12.

Footnote 51:

  _ZdmG._, xliii. 547.

Footnote 52:

  Konstantin Oikonomos, περὶ τῶν ό ἑρμηνευτῶν, Bk. iv. p. 975.

Footnote 53:

  Hody, 1684, p. 254 ff.

Footnote 54:

  _Vide_ Harnack in the _ThLz._, 1885, cols. 321, 324, n. 5.

Footnote 55:

  Ed. Feige, p. 53.

Footnote 56:

  _Divin. Lect._, c. xv.

Footnote 57:

  _Sächs. Sitz.-Ber._ (1889), xi. 4, 369.

Footnote 58:

  Balsamon, the Canonist (c. 1200), complains that τινὲς δι’
  αἰσχροκέρδειαν βιβλίων τῶν θείων γραφῶν ἐμπορευόμενοι ἀπήλειφον, and
  he requests σημείωσαι ταῦτα διὰ τοὺς βιβλιοκαπήλους τοὺς ἀπαλείφοντας
  τῶν θείων γραφῶν.

Footnote 59:

  On Constantine’s Bibles, see Westcott, _Canon_, c. ii. p. 426; _Bible
  in the Church_, c. vi. p. 155 ff.; Zahn, _Geschichte des N. T.
  Kanons_, i. 64. Zahn combats the supposition that the entire Bible was
  contained in each Codex, pointing out quite rightly that in that case
  the latter could not have been εὐμετακόμιστα, and moreover that
  Constantine speaks of σωμάτια, which does not mean codices but
  something much more indefinite. Nor does he believe that Eusebius
  intended to specify the number of sheets in each quire of the Codex or
  of the columns in which it was written. “The fifty Bibles might and
  would be distributed in 200 to 400 volumes.” According to the view
  taken above there would be from 150 to 200 of these. _Cf._ Scrivener,
  i. p. 118, n. 2.

Footnote 60:

  For the order of the books in א, see Westcott, _Bible in the Church_,
  Appendix B, “Contents of the most ancient MSS. of the Bible (A, B, א,
  D, Amiat.)”; _Hist. of the Canon_, Appendix D, “Catalogues of Books of
  the Bible during the first eight Centuries.”

Footnote 61:

  Six leaves are now wanting between Barnabas and Hermas. What did these
  contain, shall we suppose? Perhaps the Didache. Schmiedel makes a
  different conjecture in the _Literarisches Centralblatt_, 1897, n. 49

Footnote 62:

  _Vide_ Wordsworth and White, _Epilogus_, p. 737, _De Sectionibus
  Ammonianis in Evangeliis_.

Footnote 63:

  Ἀντεβλήθη πρὸς παλαιότατον λίαν ἀντίγραφον δεδιορθωμένον χειρὶ τοῦ
  ἁγίου μάρτυρος Παμφίλου· ὅπερ ἀντίγραφον πρὸς τῷ τέλει ὑποσημείωσίς
  τις ἰδιόχειρος αὐτοῦ ὑπέκειτο ἔχουσα οὕτως· μετελήμφθη καὶ διορθώθη
  πρὸς τὰ ἑξαπλᾶ Ὠριγένους· Ἀντωνῖνος ἀντέβαλεν· Πάμφιλος διόρθωσα.

Footnote 64:

  This agrees with the last of the so-called Apostolic Canons (85),
  which includes Κλήμεντος Ἐπιστολαὶ δύο among the Books of the New
  Testament after the Epistles of James and Jude. See Westcott, _Canon_,
  Appendix D. iii. a.

Footnote 65:

  On the Alexandrian division of the Gospels into 68, 48, 83, and 18
  sections respectively, see Kenyon in the _Journal of Theological
  Studies_, i. 149.

Footnote 66:

Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.

Opening the text

Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard

Religion

Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament

Nestle, Eberhard

Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual

Socin, _Arabic Grammar_, 2nd ed., p. 55, line 14; p. 56, line 12.

Footnote 51:

  _ZdmG._, xliii. 547.

Footnote 52:

  Konstantin Oikonomos, περὶ τῶν ό ἑρμηνευτῶν, Bk. iv. p. 975.

Footnote 53:

  Hody, 1684, p. 254 ff.

Footnote 54:

  _Vide_ Harnack in the _ThLz._, 1885, cols. 321, 324, n. 5.

Footnote 55:

  Ed. Feige, p. 53.

Footnote 56:

  _Divin. Lect._, c. xv.

Footnote 57:

  _Sächs. Sitz.-Ber._ (1889), xi. 4, 369.

Footnote 58:

  Balsamon, the Canonist (c. 1200), complains that τινὲς δι’
  αἰσχροκέρδειαν βιβλίων τῶν θείων γραφῶν ἐμπορευόμενοι ἀπήλειφον, and
  he requests σημείωσαι ταῦτα διὰ τοὺς βιβλιοκαπήλους τοὺς ἀπαλείφοντας
  τῶν θείων γραφῶν.

Footnote 59:

  On Constantine’s Bibles, see Westcott, _Canon_, c. ii. p. 426; _Bible
  in the Church_, c. vi. p. 155 ff.; Zahn, _Geschichte des N. T.
  Kanons_, i. 64. Zahn combats the supposition that the entire Bible was
  contained in each Codex, pointing out quite rightly that in that case
  the latter could not have been εὐμετακόμιστα, and moreover that
  Constantine speaks of σωμάτια, which does not mean codices but
  something much more indefinite. Nor does he believe that Eusebius
  intended to specify the number of sheets in each quire of the Codex or
  of the columns in which it was written. “The fifty Bibles might and
  would be distributed in 200 to 400 volumes.” According to the view
  taken above there would be from 150 to 200 of these. _Cf._ Scrivener,
  i. p. 118, n. 2.

Footnote 60:

  For the order of the books in א, see Westcott, _Bible in the Church_,
  Appendix B, “Contents of the most ancient MSS. of the Bible (A, B, א,
  D, Amiat.)”; _Hist. of the Canon_, Appendix D, “Catalogues of Books of
  the Bible during the first eight Centuries.”

Footnote 61:

  Six leaves are now wanting between Barnabas and Hermas. What did these
  contain, shall we suppose? Perhaps the Didache. Schmiedel makes a
  different conjecture in the _Literarisches Centralblatt_, 1897, n. 49

Footnote 62:

  _Vide_ Wordsworth and White, _Epilogus_, p. 737, _De Sectionibus
  Ammonianis in Evangeliis_.

Footnote 63:

  Ἀντεβλήθη πρὸς παλαιότατον λίαν ἀντίγραφον δεδιορθωμένον χειρὶ τοῦ
  ἁγίου μάρτυρος Παμφίλου· ὅπερ ἀντίγραφον πρὸς τῷ τέλει ὑποσημείωσίς
  τις ἰδιόχειρος αὐτοῦ ὑπέκειτο ἔχουσα οὕτως· μετελήμφθη καὶ διορθώθη
  πρὸς τὰ ἑξαπλᾶ Ὠριγένους· Ἀντωνῖνος ἀντέβαλεν· Πάμφιλος διόρθωσα.

Footnote 64:

  This agrees with the last of the so-called Apostolic Canons (85),
  which includes Κλήμεντος Ἐπιστολαὶ δύο among the Books of the New
  Testament after the Epistles of James and Jude. See Westcott, _Canon_,
  Appendix D. iii. a.

Footnote 65:

  On the Alexandrian division of the Gospels into 68, 48, 83, and 18
  sections respectively, see Kenyon in the _Journal of Theological
  Studies_, i. 149.

Footnote 66:

Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.

Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament

Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament

No reviews yet