Photolithographed by Clédat from a MS. at Lyons. Footnote 99: J. Heidenreich, _Der neutestamentliche Text bei Cyprian verglichen mit dem Vulgatatext. Eine textkritische Untersuchung zu den h. Schriften des Neuen Testamentes._ Bamberg, 1900. Footnote 100: This is the view of Zahn. Others, however, have no doubt that Tertullian made use of a Latin version. Hoppe, in his treatise, _De sermone Tertullianeo Quaestiones Selectae_ (1897), p. 6 (_de Graecismis Tertulliani_) says, “Permultas enim (constructiones) T. mutuatus est vel ex scriptoribus graecis, quibus assidue studuit, vel ex librorum sacrorum translatione latina graecismis abundante, qua utebatur.” And to this he adds, “Quam multa vocabula graeca in Tertullianeum sermonem ex Itala quae vocatur translatione redundaverint, discas ex Roenschii libro cum impigritate conscripto, qui inscribitur, _Itala und Vulgata_, ed. sec., p. 238.” The Itala is cited for _sciant quia_ (p. 18), _absque_ (p. 44), and for the use of the superlative for the positive (p. 49). On this last the writer refers to Rönsch, p. 415, and adds, “ex Itala T. hunc usum aliquotiens assumpsisse videtur, quamquam in universum vitat.” _Cf._ Westcott, _Canon_, Part I., c. iii. p. 251 ff. Footnote 101: Thus we have, following the numbers given above, in verse 4 (1) απορεισθαι and διαπορεισθαι (or διαπορειν), (2) περι τουτου and περι αυτου, (3) ιδου and και ιδου, (4) ανδρες δυο and δυο ανδρες, (5) επεστησαν and παρειστηκεισαν, (7) εν εσθητι αστραπτουση (or λαμπρα) and εν εσθησεσιν αστραπτουσαις (or λευκαις), (8) εμφοβων (or εν φοβω) δε γενομενων και κλινουσων and ενφοβοι δε γενομεναι εκλειναν, (9) τα προσωπα and το προσωπον (αυτων); in verse 11, (10) ενωπιον αυτων and its omission; in verse 13, (14) εξηκοντα and εκατον εξηκοντα, (15) ᾗ ονομα and ονοματι, (16) Εμμαους and ουλαμμαους. Of these (8), (15), and (16) are found only in D. In the case of (15) the very same variation is found at Tob. vi. 10 in the two recensions represented by _Codex Vaticanus_ and _Codex Sinaiticus_. Footnote 102: 1889, 91, 93, 95, 98; cited in the sequel as W.-W. Footnote 103: On the _Epilogus_ to the first volume of their Oxford edition, see especially S. Berger in the _Revue Critique_, 1889, pp. 141-144; and on the whole, Burkitt, _The Vulgate Gospels and the Codex Brixianus_, in the _Journal of Theological Studies_, I. i. (Oct. 1899) pp. 129-134. Footnote 104: Compare E. Maugenot, _Les manuscrits grecs des évangiles employés par Saint Jerôme_, in the _Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques_, January 1900. Footnote 105: