The second form, “with us all,” which was adopted by Melanchthon in his Greek Bible of 1545, published by Herwag, is just as arbitrary an alteration. The third form, “with all the saints,” is read by the Complutensian with Q, with more than forty minuscules, and the Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian versions. The fourth, “with all,” is found in A and Codex Amiatinus, while the fifth, “with the saints,” is given by א and the Old Latin g. In the Syriac version of the Apocalypse, edited by Gwynn in 1897, a sixth form seems to have been brought to light, which Baljon, who himself decides for (5), cites as μετὰ πάντων τῶν ἁγίων αὐτοῦ: Syr^{gwynn}. But the pronoun, which in Syriac is indicated by a suffix only, is employed now and again merely to represent the Greek definite article, so that this new Syriac manuscript does not give us a sixth form but only another witness to the third. On the other hand, Gwynn mentions the omission of the entire verse in Primasius, a fact that neither Tischendorf nor Weiss takes the least notice of, and he adduces lastly that a manuscript of the Vulgate reads “cum omnibus _hominibus_.” One sees from an illustration like this what an amount of pains is required seriously to apply, even in a single point, Bengel’s principle that the smallest particle of gold is gold, but that nothing must be passed as gold that has not been proved to be such (_Introductio in Crisin Novi Testamenti_, § 1, p. 572). (2) LITERATURE.—See especially Gebhardt (_Urt._, p. 16). Ed. Reuss, _Geschichte der h. Schriften des N. T._, Braunschweig, 1887, § 351 ff. S. P. Tregelles, _An Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the N.T._ (= vol. iv. of Horne’s _Introduction_, 1877). F. H. A. Scrivener (see above, p. 6); also _Adversaria Critica Sacra_, edited by Miller, Cambr. 1893. B. F. Westcott, _The New Testament_ in Smith’s _Dictionary of the Bible_, vol. ii., London, 1863. C. E. Hammond, _Outlines of Textual Criticism_, Oxford, 1890. Westcott-Hort, vol. ii. (see p. 21). B. B. Warfield, _Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the N. T._, New York, 1887; London, 1893. J. W. Burgon, _Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel according to St. Mark_, Oxford and London, 1871; also _The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels vindicated and established_, edited by Miller, London, 1896; also, _The Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels_, edited by Miller, London and Cambridge, 1896. _The Oxford Debate on the Textual Criticism of the N. T. held at New College on May 6, 1897_; with a preface (by Miller) explanatory of the Rival Systems, 1897, pp. xvi. 43. Ed. Miller, _The Present State of the Textual Controversy respecting the Holy Gospels_ (see above, p. 152).