It is quite uncertain when our four Gospels were first written together in one volume and arranged in the order that is now common. The Muratorian Fragment on the Canon[130] is defective at the beginning, but seems to imply this arrangement. It was supposed that the Gospels were written in the following order—viz. Matthew first and John last. The order, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, which is found in nearly all the Greek and Syriac manuscripts, was made popular by Eusebius and Jerome. The former followed it in his _Canons_, which were afterwards adopted by Jerome in his Latin Bible. According to Eusebius (_Eccl. Hist._, vi. 25),[131] Origen knew this order, though he very frequently cites the Gospels in the order Matthew, Luke, Mark. The following arrangements are also found:— [Transcriber’s Note: The following list begins with (2).] (2) Matthew, Mark, John, Luke, in the earlier (Curetonian) Syriac and in the Canon Mommsenianus, a catalogue of the Books of the Bible and of the works of Cyprian, originating in Latin Africa about the year 360, and first published by Mommsen.[132] (3) Matthew, Luke, Mark, John, in the so-called Ambrosiaster and in a Catalogue of the Sixty Canonical Books. (4) Matthew, John, Mark, Luke—_i.e._ the two Apostles put before the two pupils of Apostles, in the Codex Claromontanus.[133] This order occurs also in the Arabic writer Masudi’s _Meadows of Gold_.[134] (5) Matthew, John, Luke, Mark, in Codd. D and X, in the _Apostolic Constitutions_, in Ulfilas, and especially in the Old Latin Manuscripts; see Corssen, _Monarchianische Prologe_, p. 65, in _TU._ xv. 1.[135] (6) John, Luke, Mark, Matthew, in Codex k. (7) John, Matthew, Mark, Luke, in the Vocabularies of the Egyptian versions. (8) John, Matthew, Luke, Mark, in Tertullian and cod. 19. See Arthur Wright, _Some New Testament Problems_, p. 196 ff.[136]