Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
Gerhard von Maestricht laid down forty-three Critical Canons, and
Wettstein set forth in his New Testament his _Animadversiones et
Cautiones ad examen variarum lectionum Novi Testamenti necessariae_
(vol. ii. 851-874). In 1755 J. D. Michaelis added to his _Curae in
versionem Syriacam Act. Apost._ his _Consectaria critica de ... usu
versionis Syriacae tabularum Novi Foederis_.[258] Bengel reduced all the
rules to a single one. Quite recently Wordsworth and White comprehended
the rules they followed in the preparation of the text of their Latin
New Testament in four sentences. Of these the first two apply to a
version only, and therefore do not concern us here;[259] while the
fourth (_brevior lectio probabilior_) is but another form of Bengel’s
canon. The third alone may be regarded as new and deserving of
attention—viz., _vera lectio ad finem victoriam reportat_. That is to
say, if a phrase is repeated in several passages in the same or similar
terms, and displays variants in the earlier passages, the reading of the
later passage will, as a rule, be the correct one, the reason being that
copyists are apt to consider a certain reading to be an error the first
time it occurs, and therefore to alter it, but come in the end to admit
it as correct.
I would once more briefly emphasize the following propositions:—
(1) The text of our manuscripts must not be regarded as homogeneous,
but must be examined separately for each part of the New Testament.
A manuscript that exhibits a very good text in one book does not
necessarily do the same in the others. The same thing holds good of
versions and quotations.
(2) The text is preserved with less alteration in the versions than
in the manuscripts.[260]
(3) In the Gospels that reading is the more probable which differs
from that of the parallel passages.
(4) The influence of the ecclesiastical use of the Scriptures on the
text must be more carefully attended to than heretofore.
(5) One of the most valuable aids in estimating the importance of
the witnesses is the proper names, particularly those of less
frequent occurrence.
(6) “Proclivi scriptioni praestat ardua.”
[Sidenote: Proper names.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account