Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
xviii. 20. On the form in which this saying is found in the Oxyrhynchus
Logia, compare Ephraem (Moesinger 165), “ubi unus est ibi et ego sum.”
Zahn believes that Ephraem found this in his text, but that Aphraates,
who also has it, arrived at it by way of a “spiritual interpretation” of
the canonical words. After quoting the comments of Aphraates on these
words, Zahn says: “It appears certain, therefore, that Aphraates did not
find in his text the apocryphal sentence given in Ephraem, but by way of
interpretation reached the same thought that Ephraem found in his text
as a word of comfort spoken by Jesus to the lonely. (Ephraem introduces
the saying with the words: ‘He comforted them in His saying.’) The
interpretation, which may not have been original in Aphraates, became
first a gloss and then part of the text of Tatian’s Harmony.” This
should be noticed in connection with the Oxyrhynchus Logion. See Burkitt
in the Introduction to Barnard’s _Biblical Text of Clement_ (_Texts and
Studies_, v. 5, p. xiv).
xx. 13. The peculiar form of the householder’s reply given in Syr^{cu},
μὴ ἀδίκει με (Baethgen, μή μοι κόπους πάρεχε) is ignored by Tischendorf.
Our commentators also err in not taking note of the variant συνεφώνησά
σοι for συνεφώνησάς μοι. Compare the similar variation in John viii. 57;
also Luke xviii. 20, τὰς ἐντολὰς οἶδα, read by the Marcionites instead
of οἶδας; and Ephes. v. 14, ἐπιψαύσεις τοῦ Χριστοῦ, derived through a
presupposed reading, ἐπιψαύσει σοι ὁ Χριστός. Συνεφώνησά σοι in Matt.
xx. 13 is also attested by Syr^{sin}, which agrees with the common text
in the first member of the verse. It is also found in the
newly-discovered purple manuscript in Paris. The Arabic Tatian agrees
with the usual text in both members. On the strange mixture of this
verse and Luke xvi. 25 in Petrus Siculus (ἑταῖρε, οὐκ ἀδικῶ σε· ἀπέλαβες
τὰ σὰ ἐν τῇ ζωῇ σου· νῦν ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε) see Zahn, _GK._, ii.
445.
xx. 16. The concluding member of this verse is now rightly omitted with
א B L Z and the Egyptian versions. All the Syriac versions have it,
including the newly-discovered Syr^{sin}. It is worth observing that the
verse with this addition forms the close of a lection in Syr^{hier}.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account