Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
xv. 47. On Marcion’s reading, ὁ δεύτερος κύριος ἐξ οὐρανοῦ, see Zahn,
_GK._ i. 638, who suggests that this may have been an early gloss that
Marcion made use of, seeing that it is in the highest degree improbable
that the heretic and some of his most violent opponents should alter the
original text in exactly the same way.
xv. 55. Tertullian found νεῖκος in Marcion, and he therefore leaves it
an open question whether the word signifies _victoria tua_ or _contentio
tua_ (v. 10, p. 306). See Zahn, _GK._ i. 51.
xvi. 22. On “Maranatha,” see Zahn (_Einleitung_, i. 215 ff.), who, while
admitting that no objection on the ground of language or grammar can be
made to reading the word as מרן אתא = ὁ κύριος ἡμῶν ἦλθεν (not ἔρχεται
or ἐλεύσεται), prefers with Halévy, Bickell, and Nöldeke, to take it as
מרנא תא = κύριε ἔρχου, which corresponds to the Peshitto rendering of
Apoc. xxii. 20, תא מריא ישוע (ἔρχου κύριε Ἰησοῦ). See note by Schmiedel
in the _Hand-Commentar_ on 1 Cor. xvi. 22, and the article by Thayer in
Hastings’ _Dictionary of the Bible_, _sub voce_. Luther has “Maharam
Motha,” but whence he derived this I do not know.
Subscription: ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Φιλίππων (τῆς Μακεδονίας) διὰ Στεφανᾶ καὶ
Φορτουνάτου καὶ Ἀχαϊκοῦ (Κουάρτου) καὶ Τιμοθέου; _al._ ὑπὸ Παύλου καὶ
Σωσθένους; _al._ ἀπὸ Ἐφέσου τῆς Ἀσίας.
2 Corinthians.
i. 12. Recent editors adopt the reading ἁγιότητι on the authority of א*
A B C K M P etc. Zahn, however (_Einleitung_, i. 243), prefers ἁπλότητι
as given by א^c D E G etc. Meyer thinks that ἁπλότητι was substituted
for ἁγιότητι as being the more usual expression. Tischendorf is wrong in
saying: de suo add. syr^{sch} _et cum puritate_. The Syriac has בפשיטותא
ובדכיותא ובטיבותא דאלהא—_i.e._ ἐν ἁπλότητι καὶ ἐν εἰλικρινείᾳ[283] καὶ
ἐν χάριτι [τοῦ] θεοῦ ἀνεστράφημεν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ καὶ οὐκ ἐν.... vii. 2.
Zahn (_GK._ i. 650; ii. 515) thinks perhaps the whole section vii. 2-xi.
1 was omitted by Marcion: “Let us cleanse ourselves from defilement of
the flesh and blood ... for I espoused you as a pure virgin to one
husband, (even) Christ.”
Subscription: ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Φιλίππων (+ τῆς Μακεδονίας) + διὰ Τίτου (+
Βαρνάβα) καὶ Λουκᾶ.
Galatians.
i. 8. As illustrating how far the sharpest critic may be led astray by
his fondness for conjectural emendation, it may be mentioned here that
Hitzig (_Das Buch Hiob_, 1874, p. 199), suggested that Η Α̅Χ̅Σ̅ formerly
occupied the place of ἡμεῖς in this verse, and that this means ἢ
ἀρχιερεὺς!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account