Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
Here B and F read κυριος ο θεος υμων
ΟϹ εν ουρανω ανω, while on the other hand A in place of ΟϹ has Θ̅Ϲ̅,
which in this instance is correct. In 1 Tim. iii. 16 the other
witnesses—viz. the versions and the Fathers—throw their weight into the
opposite scale.
iv. 3. Isidore asks whether κωλυόντων ... ἀπέχεσθαι βρωμάτων may not be
a σφάλμα of the scribes for ἀντέχεσθαι, to which Oecumenius replies that
it is no σφάλμα καλλιγραφικόν but good Attic Greek for κωλύειν ἀπὸ τῆς
βρώσεως. The explanation of Theophylact, however, is nearer the mark,
that συμβουλεύειν is to be supplied from κωλύειν. Bentley, Toup,
Bakhuyzen, and Bois would supply κελευόντων before ἀπέχεσθαι, while Hort
suggests the substitution of ἢ ἅπτεσθαι or καὶ γεύεσθαι in place of
ἀπέχεσθαι. There seems to be no need of such expedients.
Subscription: ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Λαοδικείας + ἥτις ἐστὶν μητρόπολις Φρυγίας τῆς
Καπατιάνης (Πακατιάνης): _al._ ἀπὸ Νικοπόλεως: _al._ ἀπὸ Ἀθηνῶν: _al._
ἀπὸ Ῥώμης + διὰ Τίτου.
2 Timothy.
iv. 19. After Ἀκύλαν two minuscules (46 and 109) insert Λέκτραν τὴν
γυναῖκα αὐτοῦ καὶ Σιμαίαν (Σημαιαν 109) καὶ Ζήνωνα τοὺς υἱοὺς αὐτοῦ. The
interpolation is derived from the _Acta Pauli_, and is to be connected
not with Aquila, but with the “house of Onesiphorus.” See Zahn,
_Einleitung_, i. 411.
Subscription: ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Λαοδικείας: _al._ ἀπὸ Ῥώμης + ὅτε ἐκ δευτέρου
παρέστη Παῦλος τῷ καίσαρι Νέρωνι.
Titus.
i. 9, 11. Considerable additions are made to the text after both these
verses by Codex 109. This manuscript is numbered 11 in the Library of
St. Mark at Venice, and described by Gregory as “haud malae notae.” It
contains both a Latin and an Arabic version, and dates from the
thirteenth or fourteenth, or, as some suppose, the eleventh, century.
After verse 9 we read: μὴ χειροτονεῖν διγάμους μηδὲ διακόνους αὐτοὺς
ποιεῖν, μηδὲ γυναῖκας ἔχειν ἐκ διγαμίας· μηδὲ προσερχέσθωσαν ἐν τῷ
θυσιαστηρίῳ λειτουργεῖν τὸ θεῖον· τοὺς ἄρχοντας τοὺς ἀδικοκριτὰς καὶ
ἅρπαγας καὶ ψεύστας καὶ ἀνελεήμονας ἔλεγχε ὡς θεοῦ διάκονος. After verse
11 we find τὰ τέκνα τοὺς ἰδίους γονεῖς ὑβρίζοντας ἢ τύπτοντας ἐπιστόμιζε
καὶ ἔλεγχε καὶ νουθέτει ὡς πατὴρ τέκνα.
Subscription: πρὸς Τίτον (+ τῆς Κρητῶν ἐκκλησίας πρῶτον ἐπίσκοπον
χειροτονηθέντα) ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Νικοπόλεως τῆς Μακεδονίας (missa per Arteman:
_al._ per Zenam et Apollo).
Hebrews.
i. 3. Instead of φέρων, the first hand of B wrote φανερῶν, which a
second hand altered to φέρων, while a third restored φανερῶν, and wrote
in the margin ἀμαθέστατε καὶ κακέ, ἄφες τὸν [? τὸ] παλαιόν, μὴ
μεταποίει. A great deal of material might be collected from the margin
of old manuscripts, not only for the history of Prayer, as von Dobschütz
recently observed, but for other interesting departments of the history
of civilisation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account