Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
In order to ascertain the relationship of the manuscripts we must
select passages that exhibit a considerable divergence of meaning with
a small variation of form. Such a passage occurs in the last chapter.
In Apoc. xxii. 14, after the words “blessed are they,” we read, in the
one class of witnesses, “that wash their robes,” in the other, “that
do his commandments.” That is to say, we have in the one case
ΟΙΠΛΥΝΟΝΤΕϹΤΑϹϹΤΟΛΑϹΑΥΤΩΝ and in the other ΟΙΠΟΙΟΥΝΤΕϹΤΑϹΕ̅ΤΟΛΑϹΑΥΤΟΥ.
The difference is exceedingly small, especially when we consider that
in early times ΟΙ was frequently written Υ, and ΕΝ at the end of a
line Ε̅. I have no doubt that “wash their robes” is the original
reading here and that “do his commandments” is the later alteration,
though, of course, others will hold the opposite view. For the former
we have the authority of א A, for the latter that of Q (_i.e._,
B^{apoc}; see above, p. 80) with its associates. The question now
becomes: Are there any passages where א and A part company, and which
are decisive in favour of א? It is impossible to say offhand whether א
or A has preserved the correct text. א contains corrections that A
does not, and _vice versa_. Take another example.
The author of the Apocalypse follows the Hebrew idiom, according to
which the word or phrase in apposition to an oblique case is put in the
nominative.[292] Thus we have:
ii. 20. τὴν γυναῖκα Ἰεζαβὲλ ἡ λέγουσα. Q makes this ἣ λέγει, and the
corrector of א τὴν λέγουσαν. Similarly, iii. 12, τῆς καινῆς Ἱερουσαλὴμ ἡ
καταβαίνουσα, where again Q has ἣ καταβαίνει, and א^c τῆς καταβαινούσης.
But it is not only the later corrector of א that does this: the first
scribe of that manuscript does it himself. For example:
xiv. 12. א has τῶν τηρούντων instead of οἱ τηροῦντες; in verse 14 ἔχοντα
instead of ἔχων; in xx. 2, τὸν ὄφιν instead of ὁ ὄφις, etc. In other
places A, in this last A _alone_, it appears, has preserved the correct
text.
There are other places, again, where the correct reading is preserved,
perhaps, only in a later manuscript, or in none at all. We may compare
with the idiom in the Apocalypse what we find at the beginning of the
book in the passage about the seven spirits before the throne of God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account