I take the opportunity of appending to Resch’s work the fine saying which Zahn cites from Augustine’s _Contra Adversarium Legis et Prophetarum_ (ed. Bassan. x. 659 ff.) as an otherwise unknown Apocryphum. The disciples asked Jesus “de Judaeorum prophetis, quid sentire deberet, qui de adventu eius aliquid cecinisse in praeteritum putantur.” And He, “commotus talia eos etiam nunc sentire, respondit: Dimisistis vivum qui ante vos est et de mortuis fabulamini.” A similar saying from the _Acta Petri Vercell._ 10 is cited by Harnack in connection with the third of the Oxyrhynchus Logia: “Qui mecum sunt, non me intellexerunt.” Footnote 265: See Mrs. Lewis, in the _Expository Times_, November 1900, p. 56 ff., _What have we gained in the Sinaitic Palimpsest? I. St. Matthew’s Gospel_, where a number of important variants are cited from that manuscript. Footnote 266: Corderius (_Caten. Psal._, ii. 631) substitutes “ancient” for “accurate.” Footnote 267: Or “exemplo graeco,” according as the plural points are inserted or not. The passage is printed in Syriac by Cureton, p. xxxvi, who says that it is also found in the margin of the London manuscript of the Peshitto, 14456. He also gives the verses in which Juvencus paraphrases this text. Footnote 268: The other variations of the Latin witnesses are extremely instructive—viz.: locis eminentioribus superioribus g_{2} emm. honorificis m clarior dignior d m g_{2} honoratior e emm. deorsum inferius g_{2} emm. infra m inferior humilior minor superius sursum in superiori loco. utilius utile gloriam. This variety is an indication of the early age at which the text was translated into Latin. Footnote 269: The _Thesaurus Syriacus_ does not contain the word either in col. 1405 under חשמיתא, or in col. 2205 under מרא. It may also be observed in passing, that the passage is one of those whose sense is entirely changed by the insertion or omission of the negative in this or that witness (see below on Gal. ii. 5). Instead of καὶ ἐκ μείζονος, Syr^{cu} reads καὶ μὴ ἐκ μείζονος. Moreover, it takes ζητεῖτε as imperative, a fact that Tischendorf has failed to notice. Footnote 270: I see that Chase, who discusses the passage in pp. 9-14 of his _Syro-Latin Text_, has the same impression: “the compound Greek word in D, ὁ δειπνοκλήτωρ, seems intended to represent the Syriac expression ‘the lord of the supper.’” Footnote 271: The case is quite different in 1 Macc. v. 2, where the first hand of א wrote ὠργίσθησαν for ἐβουλεύσαντο. Here ὠργίσθη occurs immediately before it. Footnote 272: So given in Merx’s edition, but not in Lewis.—_Tr._ Footnote 273: