Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
[Transcriber’s Note: In this paragraph, there are two cases of letters
separated by a slash, as if describing arithmetic division, like “a/b”.
In the original book they are printed with the first item, “a”, raised
up, and the second item, “b”, printed below the first. In this e-book,
they are represented in this “a/b” form.]
[Sidenote: Canons.]
א is also the oldest MS. that has the so-called =Ammonian Sections= and
=Eusebian Canons=. In order to facilitate the study of the Gospels,
Ammonius of Alexandria arranged, alongside of Matthew’s Gospel, the
parallel passages in Mark, Luke, and John. For this purpose he was
obliged of course to dislocate these last.[62] Eusebius, however, simply
divided the four Gospels into 1162 sections—viz., 355 in Matthew, 233 in
Mark, 342 in Luke, and 232 in John. These he numbered consecutively in
each Gospel, and then arranged the numbers in ten Canons or Tables. The
first contained those passages which are found in all the four Gospels;
the second, third, and fourth those common to any particular combination
of three; the fifth to the ninth comprised the passages common to any
two, and the tenth those peculiar to each one. The number of its Canon
was then set under that of the section in the margin, and the Table
inserted at the beginning or end of the manuscript. By this means it was
possible to know in the case of each section whether a parallel was to
be found in the other Gospels, and where. In the margin opposite John
xv. 20, _e.g._, we find the numbers ρλθ/γ, _i.e._ 139/3. This tells us
that this 139th section of John is also found in Matthew and Luke. For
on referring to Canon 3 we find that it contains the passages common to
John, Matthew, and Luke, and that this section numbered 139 in John, is
90 in Matthew and 58 in Luke. And the sections being numbered
consecutively in each Gospel, we easily ascertain that the former is
Matthew x. 24, and the latter Luke vi. 40. These, or similar numbers,
were afterwards inserted in the lower margin of manuscripts, as, _e.g._,
in Codex Argenteus of the Version of Ulfilas. They are still printed
alongside the text in our larger editions, though, of course, owing to
the introduction of our system of chapter and verse division they have
lost their main significance.
[Sidenote: Revisions.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account