Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
To what date does the manuscript belong? There is still extant a letter
of the first Christian Emperor Constantine dating from the year 331, in
which he asks Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine, to provide him
with fifty copies of the Old and New Testament for use in the principal
churches of his empire (πεντήκοντα σωμάτια ἐν διφθέραις ἐγκατασκεύοις)
and puts two public carriages at the bishop’s disposal for their safe
transport. We have also the letter that Eusebius sent along with these
Bibles, in which he consigns them ἐν πολυτελῶς ἠσκημένοις τεύχεσι τρισσᾶ
καὶ τετρασσᾶ—_i.e._ “in expensively prepared volumes of three and four.”
With former scholars Tischendorf understood the expression τρισσᾶ καὶ
τετρασσᾶ of the number of sheets in the quires of the manuscripts, as
though they had been composed of ternions and quaternions of twelve and
sixteen pages respectively. Others took it as referring to the number of
columns on the pages, Codex Sinaiticus, which Tischendorf believed to be
one of these fifty Bibles, being unique in showing four columns to the
page. The most probable explanation of the phrase is, however, that it
indicates the number of volumes each Bible comprised, and means that
each Bible of three or four parts, as the case might be, was packed in a
separate box.[59] Tischendorf, as has been said, saw in Codex Sinaiticus
one of these fifty Bibles. He also thought that א was the work of four
different scribes, and was confident that one of these, the one who had
written only six leaves of the New Testament, was the scribe of Codex
Vaticanus. But other authorities bring א down to the beginning of the
fifth century.
One can understand how it was that Tischendorf was led to overrate the
value of this manuscript at first, and to call it by the first letter of
the Hebrew alphabet to signify its pre-eminence over all other
manuscripts. The claim is so far justified that it is at least one of
the oldest manuscripts, and of the oldest the only one that contains the
entire New Testament. The order is that of the Gospels, Pauline Epistles
(among which Hebrews is found after 2 Thess.), Acts, Catholic Epistles,
Apocalypse, after which come Barnabas and Hermas.[60] This same order is
observed in the Old Syriac Bible, and in the first printed Greek New
Testament, the Complutensian Polyglot. The fact that Barnabas is still
tacitly included in the books of the New Testament may be taken equally
as indicating the age of א itself or that of the exemplar from which it
was copied.[61] Jerome’s recension of Origen’s Lexicon of Proper Names
in the Greek New Testament is still extant, and in it Barnabas is cited
like the other books. In the Catalogus Claromontanus, which is a very
old list of the books of the New Testament, Barnabas is even found
before the Apocalypse, an arrangement which is not found again in the
succeeding centuries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account