Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
A. CODEX ALEXANDRINUS: middle or end of the fifth century: written
probably at Alexandria: contains a note in Arabic stating that it was
presented to the library of the Patriarch of Alexandria in the year
1098. The Codex was sent by Cyril Lucar, Patriarch of Constantinople, to
Charles I. of England in 1628, and was deposited in the library of the
British Museum on its foundation in 1753, where it has been ever since.
It has been employed in the textual criticism of the New Testament since
the time of Walton. It was printed in 1786 by Woide in facsimile from
wooden type. The Old Testament portion of it was also published in
1816-1828 by Baber. The entire manuscript was issued in autotype
facsimile in 1879 and 1880.
The Codex is defective at the beginning of the New Testament, the first
twenty-six leaves down to Matthew xxv. 6 being absent, as also two
containing John vi. 50-viii. 52, and three containing 2 Cor. iv. 13-xii.
6. It also contains after the Apocalypse the (first) Epistle of Clement
of Rome and a small fragment of the so-called second Epistle, which is
really an early sermon. In the Codex these are recognised as parts of
the New Testament, inasmuch as in the table of contents prefixed to the
entire work they are included with the other books under the title ἡ
καινη διαθηκη.[64] After them is given the number of books ὁμου βιβλια,
only the figures are now, unfortunately, torn away. The contents
indicate that the Psalms of Solomon should have followed, but these have
been lost with the rest of the manuscript.
A is distinguished among the oldest manuscripts by the use of capital
letters to indicate new sections. But in order to economize room and to
obviate spacing the lines, the first letter of the section, if it occurs
in the middle of a line, is not written larger, but the one that occurs
at the beginning of the next whole line is enlarged and projects into
the margin. (_See Plate I. 2._) Later scribes have copied this so
slavishly that they have written these letters in capitals even when
they occur in the middle of the line in their manuscripts. The Egyptian
origin of this Codex is shown by its use of Coptic forms for A and M. In
several books A displays a remarkable affinity with Jerome in those very
passages where he deviates from the older Latin version.
The books in A follow the order—Gospels, Acts, Catholic Epistles,
Pauline Epistles, Apocalypse. (Westcott, _Canon_, Appendix D. xii.;
_Bible in the Church_, Appendix B.)
Woide, 1786; eiusdem, _Notitia codicis Alexandrini, Recud. cur.
notasque adjecit_ G. L. Spohn, Lipsiae, 1788; Cowper, 1860, Hansell,
1864; Photographic facsimile by Thompson, 1879; and in the
Facsimiles of the Palæographical Society, Pl. 106.
The mixed character of the text of A was early observed; see
Lagarde, _Gesammelte Abhandlungen_, p. 94.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account