Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
On the other hand, you are not for a moment to suppose that the
psycho-analytic point of view which I shall lay before you is a
speculative system of ideas. On the contrary, it is the result of
experience, being founded either on direct observations or on
conclusions drawn from observation. Whether these have been drawn in an
adequate or a justifiable manner future advances in science will show;
after nearly two and a half decades and now that I am fairly well
advanced in years I may say, without boasting, that it was particularly
difficult, intense, and all-absorbing work that yielded these
observations. I have often had the impression that our opponents were
unwilling to consider this source of our statements, as if they looked
upon them as ideas derived subjectively which anyone could dispute at
his own sweet will. This attitude on the part of my opponents is not
quite comprehensible to me. Perhaps it comes from the circumstance that
physicians pay so little attention to neurotics and listen so carelessly
to what they say that it has become impossible for them to perceive
anything in the patients’ communications or to make detailed
observations from them. I will take this opportunity of assuring you
that in these lectures I shall make few controversial references, least
of all to individuals. I have never been able to convince myself of the
truth of the saying that “strife is the father of all things.” I think
the source of it was the philosophy of the Greek sophists and that it
errs, as does the latter, through the over estimation of dialectics. It
seems to me, on the contrary, that scientific controversy, so-called, is
on the whole quite unfruitful, apart from the fact that it is almost
always conducted in a highly personal manner. Until a few years ago I
could boast that I had only once been engaged in a regular scientific
dispute, and that with one single investigator, Löwenfeld of Munich. The
end of it was that we became friends and have remained so to this day.
But I did not repeat the experiment for a very long time because I was
not certain that the outcome would be the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account