“But they murdered women. Look at the women they shot, and by order,
too. More than one woman. We shot no women. And look at their terrible
Sinn Fein regiment, the Black-and-Tans.”
“But, my dear, the Black-and-Tans were British Government police,” I
gasped.
It was no use. She smiled in a superior manner.
“You think I don’t know,” she said, “but I’ve followed every line in
the papers about the Irish question ever since you were over there.
I was always so afraid you might have been shot in an ambush, and I
should so hate not seeing it. I remember seeing in the paper--I cut
out the paragraph to show you, but I lost it--that the majority of the
Black-and-Tans were Irishmen.”
“But a Government force.”
“Nonsense. I’m sure you’re mistaken. I must look for the paragraph.
More tea?”
Years of Sinn Fein propaganda had accomplished no more than that.
CHAPTER XXIX LOOKING BACK
Out of the whirlpool of lies, misunderstandings, prevarications,
distortions, inaccuracies and passions which go to the making up of
history, can one secure some of the causes and effects connected with
the Irish struggle since the Sinn Fein movement put aside pacific
methods and became militant? Are there conclusions to be drawn?
Three separate traditions seem to have been welded together for the
purpose of uniting Ireland in a common cause. One tradition is the
political tradition that Ireland possesses a national individuality,
and must continue to struggle for the expression of that individuality
until it is obtained. A second tradition is the Gaelic tradition,
that Ireland must revive and cherish the Gaelic spirit, the Gaelic
culture, the Gaelic language and literature. The third tradition is the
tradition that internal affairs must be altered and improved. These
three traditions came together in the Sinn Fein movement. The Irish
Republic was to be an independent republic, it was to be as far as
possible a Gaelic republic, and as a state it was to be an example to
the world.
Each generation of Irish leaders, to grind their patriotic axes, have
insisted that Ireland is a conquered country, suffering the fate of the
conquered. The statement is too sweeping. Ireland has been part of a
united kingdom with a common legislation. She has suffered to a certain
extent from the too centralised parliament at Westminster, where her
local affairs have frequently been crowded out. She has been legislated
for as an industrial country when she is in reality an agricultural
country. She has suffered from absentee landlords, another effect of
centralisation. She has suffered in other ways; but she has suffered
most of all from herself, from her inability ever to become united,
to hold an individual opinion, to cease being hag-ridden by religion,
which has starved her educationally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account