Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
History
Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)
Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
Ireland -- History
that the long war “cost England many millions in treasure, and the blood
of tens of thousands of her veteran soldiers, and, from the face of
Ireland, it swept nearly one-half of the entire population.” (Mitchel.)
And, he continues: “From that day (March 30, 1603, when O’Neill
surrendered at Mellifont), the distinction of ‘Pale’ and ‘Irish country’
was at an end; and the authority of the kings of England and their
(Anglo) Irish parliaments became, for the first time, paramount over the
whole island. The pride of ancient Erin—the haughty struggle of Irish
nationhood against foreign institutions and the detested spirit of
English imperialism, for that time, sunk in blood and horror, but the
Irish nation is an undying essence, and that noble struggle paused for a
season, only to recommence in other forms and on wider ground—to be
renewed, and again renewed, until—Ah! quousque, Domine, quousque?”
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER XIV
Treachery of James I to the Irish Chiefs—“The Flight of the Earls”
AT the outset of his reign, James I, of England, and VI of Scotland,
collateral descendant of that Edward Bruce who had been crowned King of
the Irish in the beginning of the fourteenth century, promised to rule
Ireland in a loving and paternal spirit. He had received at his London
court, with great urbanity, Hugh O’Neill and Roderick O’Donnell, and had
confirmed them in their English titles of Earl of Tyrone and Earl of
Tyrconnel, respectively. They had accompanied Mountjoy to England, to
make their “submissions” in due form before the king, and, while en
route through that country, were grossly insulted at many points by the
common people, who could not forget their relatives lying dead in heaps
in Irish soil, because of the prowess of the chieftains who were now the
guests of England. It is most remarkable that the English people have
always honored and hospitably entertained the distinguished “rebels” of
all countries but Ireland. Refugees from Poland, from Austria, from
Hungary, from France, from Italy—many of them charged with using
assassin methods—have been warmly welcomed in London, and even protected
by the courts of law, as in the case of the Orsini-infernal-machine
conspirators against Napoleon III, in 1859; but no Irish “rebel” has
ever been honored, or sheltered, or defended by the English people, or
the English courts of law; although individual Englishmen, like Lord
Byron, Percy Shelley, and a few others of their calibre, have written
and spoken in assertion of Ireland’s right to a separate existence. Of
course, the reason is that all the other “rebels” fought in “good
causes,” and, according to English political ethics, no cause can
possibly be just in which the right of England to govern any people
whatever against their will is contested. America learned that bitter
lesson nearly two centuries after O’Neill and O’Donnell were hooted and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account