Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
History
Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)
Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
Ireland -- History
The frightful event we have chronicled naturally aroused the worst
passions of the angered Catholic population of Ulster, and some cruel
reprisals resulted. We are sorry to be obliged to state that credible
history ascribes most of the violence committed on the Irish side to Sir
Phelim O’Neill; but no charge of the kind is made against O’More,
MacGennis, McGuire, Plunket, O’Byrne, or any of the other noted chiefs
of the period. It is impossible to arrive at any accurate statement of
the number of those who perished on both sides, outside of the numerous
battlefields of the long struggle; but it is certain they have been
grossly exaggerated, particularly by English writers, who took for
granted every wild statement made at the period. But, even granting that
all the charges made were true, which, of course, we do not admit, the
fact would not stamp the charge of cruelty on the Irish nation. It was
an age of cruelty—the age of the Thirty Years’ War in Germany, which
gave to the world the horrors of the sack of Magdeburgh; the age of the
wars of the Fronde in France, and almost that of the Spanish atrocities
in the Netherlands. And Cromwell was soon to appear upon the scene in
Ireland, to leave behind him a name more terrible than that of Tilly in
Germany or of Alva in the Low Countries. In fact, in the seventeenth
century, Europe, from east to west, was just emerging from Middle-Age
barbarism, and Ireland, most likely, was neither better nor worse than
most of her sister states. We love and respect the Irish race, but we do
not believe in painting it whiter than it is. The nation, plundered and
outraged, was goaded to madness, and whatever crimes were committed
under such circumstances may well be attributed to the workings of
temporary insanity. It is, however, regrettable that around the history
of the Irish insurrection of 1641 there should linger blood-red clouds,
which even the lapse of two and a half centuries has not been able to
dissipate.
On the Anglo-Irish side of the conflict, the name of Sir Charles Coote
stands out in bloody pre-eminence. Like Sir Phelim, he had the grand
virtue of physical courage—he feared nothing in mortal shape—but in all
else he was a demon-brute, and his memory is still execrated throughout
the length and breadth of the land he scourged with scorpions. His
soldiers are accused of having impaled Irish infants on their
pikes—their mothers having been dishonored and butchered—without rebuke
from their inhuman commander. On the contrary, McGee, a very painstaking
and impartial historian, quotes Sir Charles Coote as saying that “he
liked such frolics.” (McGee’s “History of Ireland,” Volume I, p. 502.)
It is not unpleasant to note that, after a career of the most aggressive
cruelty, he was finally killed by a musket-shot during a petty skirmish
in the County Meath, and it is popular belief that the shot was fired by
one of his own band of uniformed assassins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account