Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
History
Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)
Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
Ireland -- History
The Irish loss in killed and wounded was about four hundred. Many lives,
on both sides, were lost by sickness—dysentery and enteric fever
chiefly—during this siege. A conservative estimate places William’s
loss, by wounds and sickness, at 5,000, and the Irish at 3,000.
The day after his bloody repulse, King William sent a flag of truce to
De Boisseleau asking the privilege of burying his dead. After
consultation with Berwick and Sarsfield, the French governor refused the
request, as he suspected a ruse of some kind behind it. All the dead
were buried by the Irish as quickly as possible, because the heat was
intense, and, aside from feelings of humanity, they dreaded a plague
from the decomposition of the corpses left above ground. We are informed
by the late Mr. A. M. Sullivan, M.P., in his admirable “Story of
Ireland,” that, during the pursuit by the Irish of King William’s men
from the breach to their trenches, the temporary hospital established by
the king for his wounded caught fire. The Irish troops immediately
paused in their fierce pursuit, and devoted themselves to saving their
helpless foes in the hospital, who, otherwise, must have perished
miserably in the flames.
King William, after carefully considering the situation, and taking
counsel with his chief officers, decided that there was no hope of
capturing Limerick that year. Therefore, he declared the siege
raised—that is, abandoned—and, on August 30th, the entire Williamite
army drew off from before Limerick, posting strong rear-guards at points
of vantage, so as to baffle pursuit. The king, leaving Baron De Ginkel
in command, retired to Waterford. There he embarked for England, bidding
Ireland what proved to be an eternal farewell. Although this gloomy
monarch was not quite as ferocious as some of his contemporaries, and
was a marked improvement on Cromwell, Ireton, and Ludlow in Ireland, he
is charged by careful Irish historians—like McGee, O’Callaghan, and
Sullivan—with having, like his lieutenant, General Douglas, permitted
many outrages on the people, both in person and property, on his march
from Dublin to Limerick. Making due allowance for the difficulty of
restraining a mercenary army, filled with hatred of the people they
moved among, from committing excesses, it is regrettable that the
martial renown of William of Orange is sullied by this charge of cruelty
in Ireland, as, afterward, in connection with the foul massacre of the
Macdonalds of Glencoe in Scotland. Brave men are rarely cruel, but we
fear, in these instances, William was an exception to the rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account