Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
History
Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)
Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
Ireland -- History
Article XII read thus: “The Lords Justices and the General do undertake
that their Majesties will ratify these articles within the space of
three months, or sooner, and use their utmost endeavors that the same
shall be ratified and confirmed in the Parliament.”
The thirteenth, and final, article made provision for the protection
from financial loss of Colonel John Browne, commissary-general of the
Irish army, who, during the war, had seized the property of certain
Williamites for the public use, charging the debt, pro rata, on the
Catholic estates secured to their owners under the treaty; and requiring
General (Lord Lucan) to certify the account with Colonel Browne within
21 days.
It will be remembered, in examining the religious provisions of the
Treaty of Limerick, that Catholic worship in the reign of Charles II was
permitted by connivance rather than by law. Many of the worst of the
penal laws, although in abeyance, might be revived at any time by law
officers tyrannically disposed toward the Catholics. The latter were
once again to discover that it is one thing to obtain a favorable treaty
from a formidable enemy, while they have arms in their hands and a still
inviolate fortress at their backs, but quite a different matter to make
the foe live up to the provisions of the treaty when the favorable
conditions for the capitulators have passed away. But of this hereafter.
Not many days subsequent to the surrender of Limerick, Count
Chateau-Renaud, with a powerful French fleet, having on board arms,
cannon, and all kinds of military supplies, together with a veteran
contingent of 3,000 men and 200 officers, cast anchor in Dingle Bay, on
the southern coast, without once coming in contact with the naval might
of England. Were the Irish a dishonorable people, they could have then,
with great advantage, repudiated the treaty, but the national honor was
irrevocably plighted, and, consequently, there was an end of the
struggle. Many honest Irish writers have blamed the precipitancy of
Sarsfield and the other leaders in signing the articles of capitulation,
and not without good cause. Lord Lucan should have court-martialed and
shot the leaders of the peace-at-any-price traitors when they first
showed their hands. Hugh O’Neill, Red Hugh O’Donnell, or Owen Roe
O’Neill would have done so without hesitation, but, then, Sarsfield was
only half a Celt, and had an unfortunate tenderness for his fellows of
the Pale. It is regrettable that none of the French generals has left a
clear statement of the events that led to the premature surrender of the
town; but we know that King Louis, who subsequently honored Sarsfield,
held D’Usson responsible, for Story tells us, on page 280 of his
“Continuation of the History of the Wars in Ireland,” that “the French
king [Louis XIV] was so far from thanking him for it [the capitulation]
that, after some public indignities, he sent him to the Bastile.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account