Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
History
Ireland: The People's History of Ireland, Volume 1 (of 2)
Finerty, John F. (John Frederick)
Ireland -- History
liberty, the happiness, and the prosperity of “the most unfortunate of
nations.”
Henry having “graciously” received the submission of Strongbow and his
confederates, proceeded, at once—for he was a monarch of great energy—to
make a “royal progress” through the partially subdued portions of
Munster and Leinster. He took care, in doing this, to show Pope Adrian’s
mischievous “bull” to the Irish prelates and princes, some of whom, to
their discredit be it confessed, bowed slavishly to the ill-considered
mandate of the Pontiff. Many of the princes were even base enough to
give Henry “the kiss of peace,” when, instead, they should have rushed
to arms to defend the honor and independence of their country. The
prelates, trained to ecclesiastical docility, disgusted with the
everlasting civil contentions of the country, and fearful of further
unavailing bloodshed, had some feeble excuse for their ill-timed
acquiescence, but what are we to say of those wretched Irish princes who
so weakly and wickedly betrayed their nation to the foreign usurper?
They were by no means ignorant men, as times went, but they were
ambitious, vain, and jealous of the half-acknowledged authority of High
King Roderick, who, poor man, seems to have been the Henry VI of
Ireland. Those treasonable princes deserve enduring infamy, and foremost
among them were Dermid McCarthy, King of Desmond, and Donald O’Brien,
King of Thomond. Both lived to regret most bitterly their cowardice and
treason.
Henry II was a politic monarch. He flattered the pliable Irish bishops
and spoke to them gently about Church reforms, while he palavered the
despicable Irish princes, and, at the same time, pretended to favor the
common people and affected to check the rapacity of his Norman subjects.
Hostilities ceased for a time, except on the borders of Leinster and
Connaught, where King Roderick, deserted by many of his allies, and
deeply depressed at the absence of national union against the invaders,
kept up an unavailing resistance. In this he was encouraged and aided by
the patriotic Archbishop of Dublin, St. Lorcan O’Tuhill, who appears to
have been the only man among the entire Irish hierarchy who comprehended
the iron grip the Normans had on the throat of Ireland. Had all the
prelates been like St. Lorcan, and preached a war of extermination
against the invaders at the outset, Ireland could, undoubtedly, have
thrown off the yoke, because the princes would have been forced by their
people, over whom the bishops had great moral sway, to heal their feuds
and make common cause for their country. King Roderick, despite his
errors, deserves honor for his patriotic spirit. The Ulster princes,
too, with few exceptions, stood out manfully against the foreigner, and
a long period elapsed before the Anglo-Norman power found a secure
footing amid the rugged glens and dense forests of the western and
northern portions of the invaded island.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account