Ireland under the Stuarts and During the Interregnum, Vol. 2 (of 3), 1642-1660Bagwell, Richard
History
Ireland under the Stuarts and During the Interregnum, Vol. 2 (of 3), 1642-1660
Bagwell, Richard
Ireland -- History -- 17th century
rebels of England.' By the third the clergy were ordered under severe
penalties to preach unity, 'and we hereby manifest our detestation
against all such divisions between either provinces or families, or
between old English and old Irish, or any of the English or Scotch
adhering to his Majesty.' The last decree was one of excommunication
against the highwaymen called Idle Boys, and against all who relieved
them. Clergymen were forbidden on pain of suspension to give them the
Sacrament or to bury them in consecrated ground.[165]
FOOTNOTES:
[147] The two declarations, August 23 and 24, are in the new edition of
Carlyle's _Cromwell_, i. 455 and iii. 410.
[148] Wood's _Fasti_, ed. Bliss, 77, and his _Life and Times_, ed.
Clark, i. 110. The correspondence between Aston and Ormonde, from the
Carte MSS., August 25 to September 10, is in _Contemp. Hist._ ii.
233-261. As to the composition of the garrison see also Gardiner's
_Commonwealth_, i. 124, and the note to Murphy's _Cromwell in Ireland_,
p. 86.
[149] The chief authority for the storm is Cromwell's own letter to
Lenthall, dated September 17; Ormonde's account is dated September
29. The above, with those of Ludlow, Bate, and Wood, are collected in
_Contemp. Hist._ ii. 262-276. For Cromwell's battering train see Mr.
Firth's _Cromwell's Army_, p. 170. Elaborate accounts of the siege,
with maps, are in Gardiner's _Commonwealth_, chap. v., and in Murphy's
_Cromwell in Ireland_, chaps. vii. and viii.
[150] Letters of Peters and Cromwell, September 15 and 16, in
_Whitelock_, iii. 110, which were read in Parliament; letters of
Ormonde and Aston, _ut sup._ For Talbot's obligations to Reynolds see
Clarke's _Life of James II._ i. 326. Hugh Peters says shortly 'Aston
the governor killed, none spared.'
[151] The terms of the treaty between Ormonde and O'Neill from the
Carte papers is in _Contemp. Hist._ ii. 300, the negotiations, _ib._
237 _sqq._ The first mention of O'Neill's illness is in his letter of
September 19, 'an unexpected fit of sickness in my knee, whereof I am
not fully cleared yet.'
[152] Summons to Dundalk, September 12, 1640, in Carlyle. Venables to
Cromwell, September 22, in _Contemp. Hist._ ii. 267; Brief Chronicle,
_ib._ iii. 157; Ormonde's report on the state of the armies, _ib._
ii. 465; O'Neill's last letter to Ormonde, November 1, _ib._ 315;
_Aphorismical Discovery_, chap. xiv. In _Spicilegium Ossoriense_, ii.
33, are four letters from O'Neill, dated May 18, 1649, to Rinuccini, to
Dean Massari, and to Cardinals la Cuena and Pamphili. Daniel O'Neill's
letter of October 6 to Ormonde is in _Contemp. Hist._ ii. 294. There is
no reason whatever to suppose that Owen Roe O'Neill was poisoned.
[153] Cromwell's letters are in _Carlyle_, and the terms demanded by
Synnott in Cary's _Memorials_, ii. 181. Castlehaven's _Memoirs_, p. 80.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account