Ireland under the Stuarts and During the Interregnum, Vol. 3 (of 3), 1660-1690Bagwell, Richard
History
Ireland under the Stuarts and During the Interregnum, Vol. 3 (of 3), 1660-1690
Bagwell, Richard
Ireland -- History -- 17th century
[178] _Sheridan MS._ Letters of Barillon, September 13/23, 1686, and
September 6/16, 1687, and of Bonrepaus, August 25/September 4 1687, in
notes to Macaulay, chap. viii. Luttrell, i. 495, 500. King, iii. 8, and
Keating's letter of December 29 in appx. xiv. Evidence of Sir Robert
Colville and John Philipps to the House of Lords, _Hist. MSS. Com._,
appx. to 12th Report, part vi. 1689.
[179] Walker's _True Account_. The Comber letter is in King, appx.
xii., and in many other places. _Secret Consults of the Romish Party._
Proclamations of October 15 and December 7. The 'Irish night' in London
is sufficiently described by Macaulay, chap. x. _Ellis Correspondence_,
ii. 356. Writing to her cousin Abigail Harley on December 13, 1688,
Mrs. Pye says, 'The watch called all up that the Irish were near, and
at Knightsbridge had killed man, woman, and child, and were resolved
for to fire and massacre. I bless God I was not much frighted as might
be expected,' _Portland Papers_, iii. 420.
[180] _Faithful History of the Northern Affairs_, &c., licensed
December 10, 1689.
[181] Andrew Hamilton's _True Relation_, 1690. He says there were
public masses through the North 'for the furthering of that which they
called Inteneragh--that is, a secret intention.'
[182] _Faithful History of Northern Affairs_, 1689.
CHAPTER L
JAMES II. IN IRELAND, 1689
[Sidenote: French designs on Ireland.]
At the beginning of 1686, Bonrepaus, a high official in the French
marine, was sent by Louis XIV. on a special mission to England.
He found the navy there in very bad order, also discovering that
Sunderland and Barillon were closely allied, and that the French
diplomatist was no match for the English politician. He believed that
in this way many important secrets became known to the Prince of
Orange. Avaux wrote to the same effect from Holland, and even Skelton
formed a similar opinion. Tyrconnel thought he could utilise Bonrepaus
and defeat Sunderland, and when the former returned to England in the
summer of 1687, he pressed him to come to Chester and arrange with
James for the separation of Ireland from England in the event of a
Protestant succeeding him on the throne. Tyrconnel and Sunderland were
both with the King in August, but Bonrepaus trusted neither of them and
kept away from Chester. James had no idea that he would be dethroned
in little more than one year, and thought Ireland might be in a fit
state after five of leisurely preparation, but Tyrconnel, who may have
seen more clearly that his master was on the road to ruin, pressed for
more speedy measures, and made all the military preparations that he
could. Seignelay particularly cautioned Bonrepaus not to let Barillon
know anything about his dealings with Tyrconnel. Sunderland, however,
told the ambassador a good deal, adding that the King was determined
to repeal the Irish Act of Settlement, and that in the opinion of all
Englishmen this would lead to an entire separation of Ireland from
England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account