Ireland under the Tudors, with a Succinct Account of the Earlier History. Vol. 2 (of 3)Bagwell, Richard
History
Ireland under the Tudors, with a Succinct Account of the Earlier History. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Bagwell, Richard
Ireland -- History -- 16th century
[306] Essex to the Queen, July 22.
[307] Sidney's Brief Relation, 1583, in _Carew_. Essex to the Queen, July
31; to Walsingham, same date. There is a tradition that one woman hid in
a cave and escaped the massacre; Hill's _MacDonnells_, p. 186. Captain
Drake's pay was 42_s._ a month. The Queen to Essex, Aug. 12, in _Carew_.
[308] F. Lany to Sidney, Sept. 16; Essex to the Queen, July 31; Sidney to
the Privy Council, November 15, in the _Sidney Papers_; Ralph Bagenal to
Burghley, Nov. 24.
[309] Sidney to the Privy Council, June 15, 1576, in _Sidney Papers_.
[310] Sidney to the Privy Council, Nov. 15, 1575, in the _Sidney Papers_;
Ralph Bagenal to Burghley, Nov. 24.
[311] Sidney to the Privy Council, _ut supra_.
CHAPTER XXXIII.
ADMINISTRATION OF SIDNEY, 1575 TO 1577.
[Sidenote: Sidney and the Butlers.]
Fitzwilliam had always maintained that Ormonde's presence was the best
guarantee for the peace of the South of Ireland, and most of the Dublin
officials were of the same opinion. But Sidney disliked him, both as too
powerful for a subject and as a professed enemy of Leicester. All those
who hoped for favour from the latter, and all those who favoured the
Geraldine faction, were willing enough to take advantage of these
rivalries and jealousies. Even Sir Barnaby Fitzpatrick, 'which good
knight was brought up to have known his duty better,' but who had many
causes of quarrel with his great neighbour, took advantage of the fact
that every rebellious and disorderly person wreaked his fury upon
Ormonde's property, which was so much scattered as not to be easily
protected. As between the Fitzpatricks and Butlers Fitzwilliam seems to
have thought that there was not much to choose, and that both chiefs were
loyal enough. But others spread reports against Sir Edmund Butler and his
brother Piers, saying that they refused to go to the Deputy in spite of
Ormonde's promise that they should go when sent for. It seems that Piers
went at once, and that Edward, who did good service as Sheriff of
Tipperary, was never sent for; but some of the English Council, acting
apparently under Leicester's influence, obtained an order from the Queen
that Edward should come in without any protection, which he immediately
did. The letter, which gave great offence to Ormonde, was signed by
Leicester, Knollys, Crofts, Smith, and Walsingham, but not by Burghley
and Sussex, though they also were present at Kenilworth.[312]
[Sidenote: Ormonde and his accusers.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account