Ireland under the Tudors, with a Succinct Account of the Earlier History. Vol. 2 (of 3)Bagwell, Richard
History
Ireland under the Tudors, with a Succinct Account of the Earlier History. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Bagwell, Richard
Ireland -- History -- 16th century
No doubt Arnold had a hard task, but it is clear that he was not the man
to make it easier. The Queen's best officers in Ireland were slighted
daily. The Lord Justice treated Archbishop Loftus with marked rudeness at
the Council Board. The Irish service had so completely bewitched him that
no Englishman could look for favour. Everything was hoped for from Shane,
whom he praised continually to the Queen, though obliged to remind
O'Neill himself that his deeds were not so very laudable. Seeing that the
men who opposed him favoured Ormonde, Arnold was in all things partial to
Kildare, and to the Geraldine party generally. The irregularities which
he found in every branch of the public service were really matters of
long standing, hardly to be visited on individuals, and largely the fault
of the Home Government. Arnold insinuated many things against
Vice-Treasurer Fitzwilliam; but when Fitzwilliam's accounts were produced
they were found to be quite correct. Stanley was recalled less because of
Arnold's accusations than because he was disliked by Sidney, and the
Queen particularly stated that she did not despise the Marshal's service,
nor credit the reports against him. The difficulty of finding out the
exact truth was no doubt very great. Even Cecil was not always well
served, for portions of a letter addressed by Fitzwilliam to him were
copied out, and transmitted to Arnold. Excuses may be made for a man who
with good intentions had raised a hornet's nest about his ears; but he
was evidently quarrelsome, arbitrary, credulous, and deficient in
personal dignity, a quality which probably carries as much weight in
Ireland as in any country in the world.[110]
FOOTNOTES:
[88] Cusack to the Privy Council, June 8, 1564; Clanricarde to the Queen,
April 12, 1565; Lord Justice and Council to Desmond, July 1, 1564; to
Thomond, July 2; Desmond to Winchester, July 26; to Cecil, July 27;
Wrothe to Lord R. Dudley, Aug. 16; Orders taken by Sir Thomas Cusack and
others between the Earls of Desmond and Thomond; Desmond, Dunboyne,
Curraghmore, and others to Cusack, Sept. 11. Stanley's letter is in the
_Arch. Journal of Ireland_, 3rd series, i. 405; _Four Masters_, 1564, who
say Corcomroe Abbey, with its church patronage, was given to Donnell
O'Brien as an equivalent for surrendering his claims by tanistry.
[89] Earl of Ormonde's proclamation, July 1, 1564. The copy in the R.O.
is by Sir T. Wrothe's clerk, and the signatures are not given.
[90] Ormonde to Cecil, Nov. 22, 1564; Cusack to same, Jan. 12, 1565;
Desmond's petition to the Queen, June 1, 1565 (No. 53), and Ormonde's
answer, June 6.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account