Irrigation works : $b the principles on which their design and working should be based, with special details relating to Indian canals and some proposed improvementsBellasis, E. S. (Edward Skelton)
Science
Irrigation works : $b the principles on which their design and working should be based, with special details relating to Indian canals and some proposed improvements
Bellasis, E. S. (Edward Skelton)
Canals; Irrigation
---------+------+------+------
DAY. | A | B | C
---------+------+------+------
1 | 2,200| |
2 | 2,200| |
3 | 2,200| |
4 | 2,200| |
5 | 2,200| |
6 | | 2,000| 200
7 | | 2,000| 200
8 | | 2,000| 200
9 | | 2,000| 200
10 | | 2,000| 200
11 | 700| | 1,500
12 | 700| | 1,500
13 | 700| | 1,500
14 | 700| | 1,500
---------+------+------+------
Total |13,800|10,000| 7,000
| | |
Correct | | |
discharge|12,800|10,300| 7,700
according| | |
to Full | | |
Supply. | | |
---------+------+------+------
The orders given to the gauge readers in these cases are simple, namely
to give each branch full supply in turn, and to send the rest of the
water down the channel next on the list.
The number of days allotted to the larger branches are greater than to
the smallest because this will probably be simplest in the end, and also
because the number of distributaries on a larger branch is likely to be
greater, and the allotment to the distributaries is thus facilitated
somewhat. Each branch receives water in one period of consecutive days.
Any splitting up of the turn would be highly objectionable. It would
cause waste of water, and would give rise to much difficulty in
redistributing the supply among its distributaries. Each branch receives
its residuum turn before it receives its full supply turn. The advantage
of this is that water is not let into the channel suddenly. The total
supplies of A, B and C are in the ratio of 13·8, 10, and 7, and not, as
they should be 12·8, 10·3, and 7·7, but no closer approximation can be
got. If the number of days of full supply allotted to each branch is
changed, or if the residuum from C is given to B, instead of A, the
relative total discharges differ still more from what they should be.
If now the total supply is supposed to be increased to 2,700 c. ft. per
second, the discharges are as shown in table VI.
TABLE VI.
----------+-------+-------+-----
DAY. | A | B | C
----------+-------+-------+-----
1 | 2,500 | 200 |
2 | 2,500 | 200 |
3 | 2,500 | 200 |
4 | 2,500 | 200 |
5 | 2,500 | 200 |
6 | | 2,000 | 700
7 | | 2,000 | 700
8 | | 2,000 | 700
9 | | 2,000 | 700
10 | | 2,000 | 700
11 | 1,200 | |1,500
12 | 1,200 | |1,500
13 | 1,200 | |1,500
14 | 1,200 | |1,500
----------+-------+-------+-----
Total |17,300 |11,000 |9,500
| | |
Correct | | |
Discharge.|15,700 |12,600 |9,500
----------+-------+-------+-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account