This gives us occasion to return to the discussion of the question, if living systems really exist which respond in accordance with the “all or none law.” The medullated nerve forms an object particularly suited to serve as a starting point for the treatment of this especially important problem. The question arises in this connection, if the validity of this law for the nerve can be tested by other means. At first it would seem as if the application of the “all or none law” to the nerve were in contradiction to the well-known fact that a weak stimulation of the nerve produces a weak, a strong stimulation, a strong response. In this connection _Gotch_[110] has pointed out, as the result of experimental studies of the wave of activity of the nerve, that the difference in response, following the application of stimuli of varying strengths, is understandable from the fact that threshold stimuli stimulate only a few of the fibers of the nerve trunk, whereas progressively increasing the intensity of the current involves more and more fibers. There can be no doubt that this factor explains the difference in the strength of the response. Therefore, in reality we do not find here a contradiction of the “all or none law.” On the other hand, the fact that the nerve, in contradistinction to many other forms of living substance, the ganglion cell, for example, upon a weak stimulation does not show the phenomena of summation, even when the stimuli follow each other in a rapid succession, indicates very strongly that the weakest operable stimulus produces maximal excitation, so that the response cannot be further increased. But above all, there is a series of facts, which have been gained in the Göttingen laboratory, which demonstrate apparently without doubt the validity of the “all or none law” for the medullated nerve. These observations I wish now to consider in greater detail. [110] _Gotch_: “The submaximal electrical response of nerve to a single stimulus.” Journal of Physiology, Vol. XXVIII, 1902.