[121] _Kronecker_: “Das charakteristische Merkmal der Herzmuskelbewegung.” Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie als Festgabe f. Carl Ludwig zum 15, Oct. 1874, gewidmet von seinen Schülern. Leipzig 1874. [122] _Th. W. Engelmann_: “Beobachtungen und Versuche am suspendierten Herzen III. Refractäre Phase und compensatorische Ruhe in ihrer Bedeutung für den Herzrhythmus.” Pflügers Arch. Bd. 59, 1895. [123] _Broca et Richet_: “Période réfractaire dans les centres nerveux.” Comptes rendus de l’academie des sciences 1897. Further _Richet_: “La vibration nerveuse.” Revue scientific Déc. 1899. [124] _Zwaardemaker und Lans_: “Ueber das Stadium relativer Unerregbarkeit als Ursache des intermittierenden Charakters des Lidschlagreflexes.” Centralblatt für Physiol. XIII, 1899. [125] _Zwaardemaker_: “Sur une phase réfractaire du reflex déglutition.” Arch. international de physiologie Vol. I, 1900. [126] _Max Verworn_: “Zur Kenntniss der physiologischen Wirkungen des Strychnins.” Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol. physiol. Abth., 1900. “Ermüdung Erschöpfung and Erholung der nervösen Centra des Rückenmarks.” Ibidem, 1900. “Die Biogenhypothese.” Jena 1903. “Die Vorgänge in den Elementen des Nervensystems.” Zeitsch. f. allgem. Physiologie Bd. VI, 1907. [127] _Dodge_: “A systematic exploration of a normal knee jerk, its technique, the form of the muscle contraction, its amplitude, its latent time and its theory.” Zeitsch. f. allgem. Physiol. Bd. XII, 1911. [128] _Gotch and Burch_: “The electrical response of nerve to two stimuli.” Journ. of Physiology, Vol. XXIV, 1899. [129] _Florence Buchanan_: “The electrical response of muscle in different kinds of persistent contraction.” Journ. of Physiology, Vol. XXVII, 1901–1902. [130] _Keith Lucas_: “On the refractory period of muscle and nerve.” Journ. of Physiology, Vol. XXXIX, 1909–1910. [131] _Massart_: Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 1901. [132] _Jennings_: “Studies on reactions to stimuli in unicellular organisms.” IX. American Journal of Physiology, 1902. [Illustration: Fig. 30. Curve of action current of the musculus sartorius excitated by two successive stimuli (St. 1 and St. 2). The effect of the second stimulus is the less and the latent period is the longer the more quickly the first stimulus is followed by the second. (_Keith Lucas._) ] We will now examine the alterations of irritability which are perceptible during the refractory period to complete restitution of the specific irritability of the particular system, and endeavor by the analysis of their special conditions to render them comprehensible from a physical standpoint of view.