If we take into consideration the various instances which can arise, perhaps we may best start with that type wherein the first stimulation produces depression, whereas the second has an exciting effect on disintegration. In this type the response to the second stimulus is weaker than when the second stimulus alone is applied. As a concrete example of this type, we may refer to the interference of an induction shock in a nerve during the relative want of oxygen. We arrange a nerve of a nerve muscle preparation of a frog in a glass chamber, as already described, and determine the threshold of stimulation of the stretch within the chamber by the weakest induction shocks which produce response. The oxygen is then removed and the effect on the threshold determined. As shown by _Baeyer_ it is found that with increasing asphyxia the threshold of stimulation for induction shocks becomes continually higher. The irritability is likewise decreased. This occurs, as the investigations of _Lodholz_ show, at first slowly, then more and more rapidly. The curve of the decrease of irritability has a logarithmic form. During the continuation of the depressing stimulus, i.e., the want of oxygen, the exciting stimulus has less and less effect. If oxygen is again brought in contact with the nerve, irritability immediately returns to its original height. The cessation of the depressing stimulus has, therefore, the effect that the exciting stimulus again brings about its original response. A second type of interference is produced when both stimuli bring about depression. As an example, we may select the interference of cold and deficiency of oxygen. If we assume, for instance, that each of these stimuli of itself brings about only a partial reduction of living processes and not a _complete_ suppression, then it would be possible to think of a summation of both depressions. Nevertheless, the conditions for the summation of depression have never been carefully analyzed. Quantitative investigations upon the interference of depressing stimuli are entirely lacking. One should not, however, in physiology presuppose what may happen under certain given conditions without first making the necessary experiments. The strength of scientific investigation depends upon the fact that every deduction, no matter how small, must be substantiated by experience before further progress can be made. So, likewise, we must await the results of thorough experimentation upon the interference of depressing stimuli before we can establish a law. The conditions are not as simple as they appear on first observation, for the point of attack of the various kinds of the depressing stimuli upon the chain of metabolic processes may be very different. In such a case it is not at once possible to understand the results of the interference.