Is The Bible Worth Reading, and Other EssaysWashburn, L. K. (Lemuel Kelley)
Religion
Is The Bible Worth Reading, and Other Essays
Washburn, L. K. (Lemuel Kelley)
Free thought
In going to the theatre, we do not always go to the same place, nor to
hear the same play, nor to witness the same actors; nor do we always visit
the same gallery or park when we desire to see paintings or statuary, or
to enjoy the flowers and general beauties of Nature. Why should men _join_
one church and go to it all their lives? Why should men hear only _one_
kind of religion preached? Why should men listen all their lives to the
preaching of one set of dogmas?
Supposing a man were to go once or twice a week for fifty years to see one
tragedy or comedy played, would he be a better judge of the drama than if
he had seen during that time a hundred tragedies and comedies? The man who
goes all his life to one church is made a denominational or sectarian
bigot. Is the object of churches to make bigots? That is about all they
have made up to date.
We hold that it is not man’s duty to _go_ to any church, to _belong_ to
any church, or to _support_ any church. _There are no religious duties._
Man is under no obligation whatever to worship God. Churches must be
placed upon the same ground as other places of instruction and amusement,
and if they cannot be supported by legitimate patronage then must they be
given up. If a man goes to church to hear a minister, let him pay for it
like a man, but if he is not pleased with what he hears he need not go
again.
The notion that there is anything of greater value to be had in the church
than elsewhere cannot be defended. This idea does not fool people of any
sense. The pulpit has no divine message for the world, but generally talks
about what no one knows anything about. Intelligent people who do not go
to church have come to the conclusion that they can derive more pleasure
from other sources. That is about the reason why they do not go to church.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
We cannot go ahead without leaving something behind.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
The convent is opposed to all that is sacred in human nature.
WHO IS THE GREATEST LIVING MAN
Written November 19, 1893.
My answer is _Robert G. Ingersoll_.
One gets the conviction of this man’s superiority by simply being in his
presence. The outer man makes the impression of greatness upon the mind.
It is not the silent assertion of a splendid form however, that persuades
us. A large body serves to accent and emphasize a large mind, but heroic
physical proportions are not essential to greatness. The king of men
to-day is not he who, like Saul, “from his shoulders and upward is higher
than any of his people.” Dr. Watts truly said: “The mind’s the standard of
the man.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account