Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friendsHood, Edwin Paxton
Religion
Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friends
Hood, Edwin Paxton
Watts, Isaac, 1674-1748
so many long years she retained a close and intimate friendship with a
judgment so wisely balanced, and a nature so simple and domestic, as that
which evidently shines in the character of the Countess of Hertford.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
CHAPTER X.
Shimei Bradbury.
There was living in London contemporary with Watts one of those ungentle,
unbeautiful spirits, from whose malignant jealousy few men of eminence
entirely escape; he appears to have been to Watts what Alexander the
coppersmith was to Paul, he did him much evil and sought to do more.
Bradbury was one of the most vehement and virulent spirits of the times,
he was infected with the prevalent spirit of railing long before he
began to cast about his Shimei and Rabshakeh pleasantries upon Watts;
he was well known for his capabilities in this way, and in 1715 Daniel
Defoe reproved him in a pamphlet entitled, “A Friendly Epistle by way
of Reproof, from one of the people called Quakers to Thomas Bradbury, a
dealer in many words.” The following paragraph illustrates the character
of the man the pamphlet is intended to represent: “Men, especially,
Thomas, preaching men, as thou art, ought much rather to move their
people and their brethren to forbear and forgive one another, than to
move and excite them to severities, and to executing revenge upon one
another, lest the day come when that which they call justice may be
deemed injustice. I counsel thee, therefore, that thou forbear to excite
thy sons of Belial to do wickedly, but rather that thou preach to them
that they repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand; which I meekly
advertise thee is the proper duty of thy employment, whereas the other is
the work of darkness and tendeth to blood.”
Again, he says: “I must lead thee by the hand, not by the nose,
Thomas—others have done thee that office already—that thou mayst be
convinced, yea, even confounded, for those whom thou hast, with so great
confidence, taken on thee to recommend as good men, and men fearing
God. I do thee justice, Thomas, and therefore observe in thy behalf
that thy modesty would not permit thee to say, ‘They were men hating
covetousness.’”[31]
Bradbury was one of those men who, pursuing politics in the pulpit
with vehement and intolerant pertinacity, degrade the standard of the
minister of the Gospel; he was even charged with desiring the blood of
the ministers of Queen Anne in the pamphlets of the day, especially in
“Burnet and Bradbury; or, the Confederacy of the Press and the Pulpit for
the Blood of the last Ministry.”[32]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account