Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friendsHood, Edwin Paxton
Religion
Isaac Watts; his life and writings, his homes and friends
Hood, Edwin Paxton
Watts, Isaac, 1674-1748
Such were “the times that went over him.” Watts lived through all those
curious transactions round the Court of Queen Anne; lived also through
the great Sacheverell riots—and a curious time that was for Dissenters,
as he bears testimony again in his little outline of coincidences with
his autobiographical memoranda. “March 1st, 1710. The mob rose and pulled
down the pews and galleries of six meeting-houses, that is, Mr. Burgess,
Mr. Bradbury, Mr. Earle, Mr. Wright, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Charles
Taylor, but were dispersed by the guards under Captain Horsey, at one
or two in the morning.” He passed through all that excitement of public
feeling arising from the introduction of the “Schism Bill,” which, beyond
anything, covered with gloom the last days of the reign of Queen Anne.
When she ascended the throne, Watts wrote a lyric in honour of her happy
accession; there was no inconsistency in his expressing almost a burst of
gladness and joy at her decease. The “Schism Bill” was worthy of the very
worst days of the Stuarts; it was intended to crush all Nonconformist
schools, and all Dissenting academies; any Nonconformist teacher was
to be imprisoned three months, every schoolmaster was to receive the
sacrament and take the oaths, and if afterwards guilty of being present
at a conventicle, to be incapacitated and imprisoned. Earl Stanhope,
in his quiet, very interesting, and, on the whole, impartial history,
speaks of “this tyrannical act,” and well remarks: “It is singular that
some of the most plain and simple notions, such as that of religious
toleration, should be the slowest and most difficult to be impressed
upon the human mind.”[35] It is interesting to notice that this measure
was greatly the creation of Lord Bolingbroke, a man who, while “he
thought it,” as Earl Stanhope says, “necessary to crush Dissenters,” was
himself altogether independent and incapable of any religious faith or
conviction. Infidelity has never found its interests on the side of true
freedom, but only of lawlessness and licentiousness, to which it is ever
fond of applying the glorious term. In the midst of the panic created
by this measure the Queen died, died on the very day the Schism Act was
to have taken effect, and George I. succeeded to the English throne. He
commenced his reign with a noble declaration of liberty of conscience. At
his first appearing in council he said, “I take this occasion to express
to you my firm purpose to do all that is in my power for the supporting
and maintaining the Churches of England and Scotland as they are by
law established, which I am of opinion may be effectually done without
the least impairing the toleration allowed by law to her Protestant
Dissenters, so agreeable to Christian charity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account